Judgment_paragraph 30 · R.P. van der Duin v Onderlinge Waarborgmaatschappij ANOZ Zorgverzekeringen UA and Onderlinge Waarborgmaatschappij ANOZ Zorgverzekeringen UA v T.W. van Wegberg-van Brederode (C-156/01)

30In that respect, the referring court notes in particular that Article 21 of Regulation No 1408/71 specifically refers to the case of employed persons who, while resident in a Member State other than the competent State, stay in the competent State, which might suggest that Article 22 of that regulation concerns only the right to benefits provided outside the territory of the competent Member State. In this case, the Kingdom of the Netherlands remained the competent State, as is suggested in particular by the wording of Article l(o) to (q) of Regulation No 1408/71 and the case-law of the Court of Justice (Case 117/77 Pierik [1978] ECR 825; Case 69/79 Jordens-Vosters [1980] ECR 75).