Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Coe Clerici Logistics SpA v Commission of the European Communities (T-52/00)
Judgment
Facts
23

Coe Clerici Logistics SpA v Commission of the European Communities (T-52/00)

Judgment of 17 Jun 2003law://eu/cjeu/2000/t-52-00/para_23@2026-11-10

23By letter of 20 December 1999 (‘the contested act’), the Commission informed the applicant that it was going to take no action on its complaint.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Fifth Chamber
Case: T-52/00 · ECLI:EU:T:2003:168
Decided: 17 Jun 2003
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Coe Clerici Logistics SpA
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Rapporteur: Lindh
Bench: 2 judges
R. García-Valdecasas, P. Lindh
Language: Italian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62000TJ0052

Topics

Dominant position Transport

History · 1 version

17 Jun 2003Reading

Connections

Cited by 2: European Commission v McCarron Poultry Ltd (T-226/14); Isabella Scippacercola and Ioannis Terezakis v Commission of the European Communities (T-306/05)
Cites 10: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; Commission Regulation (EC) No 2842/98 of 22 December 1998 on the hearing of parties in certain proceedings under Articles 85 and 86 of the EC Treaty (Text with EEA relevance); Ladbroke Racing Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (T-32/93); max.mobil Telekommunikation Service GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (T-54/99); Bundesverband der Bilanzbuchhalter e.V. v Commission of the European Communities (T-84/94); Oscar Bronner GmbH & Co. KG v Mediaprint Zeitungs- und Zeitschriftenverlag GmbH & Co. KG, Mediaprint Zeitungsvertriebsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG and Mediaprint Anzeigengesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (C-7/97); Vlaamse Televisie Maatschapij NV v Commission of the European Communities (T-266/97); Bundesverband der Bilanzbuchhalter e.V. v Commission of the European Communities (C-107/95 P); Télévision française 1 SA (TF1) v Commission of the European Communities (T-17/96); Casper Koelman v Commission of the European Communities (T-575/93)