Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Hospital Ingenieure Krankenhaustechnik Planungs-Gesellschaft mbH (HI) v Stadt Wien (C-92/00)
Judgment
Substance
The second question
59

Hospital Ingenieure Krankenhaustechnik Planungs-Gesellschaft mbH (HI) v Stadt Wien (C-92/00)

Judgment of 18 Jun 2002law://eu/cjeu/2000/c-92-00/para_59@2026-11-10

59Therefore, the question of the extent of the judicial review exercised in the context of the review procedures covered by Directive 89/665 must be examined in the light of the purpose of the latter, taking care that its effectiveness is not undermined.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Sixth Chamber
Case: C-92/00 · ECLI:EU:C:2002:379
Decided: 18 Jun 2002
Procedure: Preliminary reference
Applicant: Hospital Ingenieure Krankenhaustechnik Planungs-GmbH (HI)
Defendant: Stadt Wien
Rapporteur: V. Skouris
Advocate General: A. Tizzano
Bench: 4 judges
C. Gulmann, J.-P. Puissochet, V. Skouris, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62000CJ0092

Topics

Approximation of laws Freedom of establishment Freedom to provide services

History · 1 version

18 Jun 2002Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Council Directive 89/665/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts; Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts
Cited by 19: H. A. v État belge (C-194/19); AAS „BTA Baltic Insurance Company” v Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs and Tieslietu ministrija (C-769/21); SC Star Storage SA and Others v Institutul Naţional de Cercetare-Dezvoltare în Informatică (ICI) and Others (C-439/14, C-488/14); Intercontact Budapest Fordító és Pénzügyi Tanácsadó Kft. (Intercontact Budapest Kft.) v Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (T-640/18); Lies Craeynest and Others v Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest and Brussels Instituut voor Milieubeheer (C-723/17)2 provisions; Orange Business Belgium SA v European Commission (T-349/13); Croce Amica One Italia Srl v Azienda Regionale Emergenza Urgenza (AREU) (C-440/13); Bundesdruckerei GmbH v Stadt Dortmund (C-549/13); European Dynamics Luxembourg SA v European Central Bank (T-553/11); European Dynamics Luxembourg SA and Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission (T-165/12)2 provisions; Nexans France v European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (T-415/10)2 provisions; Evropaïki Dynamiki - Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission (T-86/09); Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (T-258/06); Evropaïki Dynamiki - Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission (T-50/05); European Service Network (ESN) SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-332/03); Evropaïki Dynamiki - Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v Commission of the European Communities (T-345/03); Commission of the European Communities v Ireland (C-507/03)2 provisions; Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (C-264/03)2 provisions; Koppensteiner GmbH v Bundesimmobiliengesellschaft mbH (C-15/04)2 provisions
Cites 14: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Council Directive 89/665/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts; Dorsch Consult Ingenieurgesellschaft mbH v Bundesbaugesellschaft Berlin mbH (C-54/96); Metalmeccanica Fracasso SpA and Leitschutz Handels- und Montage GmbH v Amt der Salzburger Landesregierung für den Bundesminister für wirtschaftliche Angelegenheiten (C-27/98); Council Directive 93/37/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts; Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts; SIAC Construction Ltd v County Council of the County of Mayo (C-19/00); The Queen v H.M. Treasury, ex parte The University of Cambridge (C-380/98); H.J. Banks & Co. Ltd v The Coal Authority and Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (C-390/98); Unitron Scandinavia A/S and 3-S A/S, Danske Svineproducenters Serviceselskab v Ministeriet for Fødevarer, Landbrug og Fiskeri (C-275/98); Josef Köllensperger GmbH & Co. KG and Atzwanger AG v Gemeindeverband Bezirkskrankenhaus Schwaz (C-103/97); Alcatel Austria AG and Others, Siemens AG Österreich and Sag-Schrack Anlagentechnik AG v Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft und Verkehr (C-81/98); Telaustria Verlags GmbH and Telefonadress GmbH v Telekom Austria AG, joined party: Herold Business Data AG (C-324/98); Courage Ltd v Bernard Crehan and Bernard Crehan v Courage Ltd and Others (C-453/99)