Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Kingdom of Belgium v Commission of the European Communities (C-457/00)
Judgment
First plea: infringement of Articles 8…
Third part of the first plea: incorrec…
55

Kingdom of Belgium v Commission of the European Communities (C-457/00)

Judgment of 3 Jul 2003law://eu/cjeu/2000/c-457-00/para_55@2026-11-10

55In that regard, in order to determine the recipient of State aid, it is necessary to identify the undertakings which have actually benefited from it.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice
Case: C-457/00 · ECLI:EU:C:2003:387
Decided: 3 Jul 2003
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Kingdom of Belgium
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Rapporteur: S. von Bahr
Advocate General: F.G. Jacobs
Bench: 4 judges
D.A.O. Edward, A. La Pergola, P. Jann, S. von Bahr
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62000CJ0457

Topics

History · 1 version

3 Jul 2003Reading

Connections

Cited by 18: European Commission and Others v Ryanair DAC (C-266/24 P); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (T-146/22)2 provisions; Ryanair DAC and Malta Air ltd. v European Commission (T-216/21)2 provisions; Ryanair DAC and Malta Air ltd. v European Commission (T-494/21)2 provisions; Elche Club de Fútbol, SAD v European Commission (T-901/16)2 provisions; Valencia Club de Fútbol, SAD v European Commission (T-732/16)2 provisions; Prosegur Compañía de Seguridad, SA v European Commission (T-406/11); Banco Santander, SA v European Commission (T-227/10); Axa Mediterranean Holding, SA v European Commission (T-405/11); European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (C-591/14)2 provisions; Abertis Telecom Terrestre, SA and Telecom Castilla-La Mancha, SA v European Commission (T-37/15); (publication by extracts) Aer Lingus Ltd v European Commission (T-473/12)2 provisions; Hellenic Republic v European Commission (T-150/12); Jan Rudolf Maas and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-81/07); Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (T-222/04); TV 2/Danmark A/S and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-309/04); SIC - Sociedade Independente de Comunicação, SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-442/03); Federal Republic of Germany v Commission of the European Communities (T-374/04)
Cites 5: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)5 provisions; Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty; European Commission v Frédéric Daffix (C-166/95 P); Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-303/88); Federal Republic of Germany, Hanseatische Industrie-Beteiligungen GmbH and Bremer Vulkan Verbund AG v Commission of the European Communities (C-329/93)