Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Republic of Austria v Council of the European Union (C-445/00)
Judgment
Facts and legal background
12

Republic of Austria v Council of the European Union (C-445/00)

Judgment of 11 Sept 2003law://eu/cjeu/2000/c-445-00/para_12@2026-11-10

12The ecopoint statistics showed 1706436 journeys during 1999, which represented a 14.57% increase over the figure for 1991.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Full Court
Case: C-445/00 · ECLI:EU:C:2003:445
Decided: 11 Sept 2003
Procedure: Action for annulment
Ruled invalid: Regulation 2000/2012
Applicant: Republic of Austria
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Rapporteur: J.N. Cunha Rodrigues
Advocate General: J. Mischo
Bench: 12 judges
J.-P. Puissochet, M. Wathelet, R. Schintgen (Presidents of Chambers), C. Gulmann, D.A.O. Edward, A. La Pergola, P. Jann, V. Skouris, F. Macken, N. Colneric, S. von Bahr, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62000CJ0445

Topics

New accessions Transport

History · 1 version

11 Sept 2003Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2000 of 21 September 2000 amending Annex 4 to Protocol No 9 to the 1994 Act of Accession and Regulation (EC) No 3298/94 with regard to the system of ecopoints for heavy goods vehicles transiting through Austria
Cited by 20: Peter Puškár v Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky and Kriminálny úrad finančnej správy (C-73/16); European Commission v Council of the European Union (C-24/20); BRF SA and SHB Comércio e Indústria de Alimentos SA v European Commission (T-429/18); Republic of Slovenia v Republic of Croatia (C-457/18); Spiegel-Verlag Rudolf Augstein GmbH & Co. KG and Michael Sauga v European Central Bank (T-116/17); Versorgungswerk der Zahnärztekammer Schleswig-Holstein v European Central Bank (T-376/13)2 provisions; Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (T-270/08); Republic of Poland v European Commission (C-335/09 P); Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (T-59/09); French Republic v European Commission (T-488/10); Evropaïki Dynamiki - Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Investment Bank (T-461/08); Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (T-576/08); Republic of Estonia v Commission of the European Communities (T-324/05); Republic of Poland v Commission of the European Communities (T-257/04); Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (T-308/05)2 provisions; Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities (T-99/05); Hellenic Republic v Commission of the European Communities (T-231/04); Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-138/03, C-324/03, C-431/03)2 provisions; Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities (C-304/01)2 provisions; Republic of Austria v Commission of the European Communities (C-356/01)2 provisions
Cites 11: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; Petrotub SA and Republica SA v Council of the European Union (C-76/00 P); Kingdom of the Netherlands v Council of the European Union (C-301/97); Levantina Agricola Industrial SA (LAISA) and CPC España SA v Council of the European Communities (C-31/86); Nashua Corporation and others v Council and Commission of the European Communities (C-150/87); Commission Regulation (EC) No 609/2000 of 21 March 2000 amending Regulation (EC) No 3298/94 laying down detailed measures concerning the system of rights of transit (ecopoints) for heavy-goods vehicles transiting through Austria (Text with EEA relevance); Commission Regulation (EC) No 3298/94 of 21 December 1994 laying down detailed measures concerning the system of Rights of Transit (Ecopoints) for heavy goods vehicles transiting through Austria, established by Article 11 of Protocol no 9 to the Act of Accession of Norway, Austria, Finland and Sweden; Commission Regulation (EC) No 1524/96 of 30 July 1996 amending Regulation (EC) No 3298/94, with regard to the system of ecopoints for heavy goods vehicles transiting through Austria; Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2000 of 21 September 2000 amending Annex 4 to Protocol No 9 to the 1994 Act of Accession and Regulation (EC) No 3298/94 with regard to the system of ecopoints for heavy goods vehicles transiting through Austria; 92/577/EEC: Council Decision of 27 November 1992 concerning the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Austria on the transit of goods by road and rail; Commission of the European Communities v Chambre syndicale nationale des entreprises de transport de fonds et valeurs (Sytraval) and Brink's France SARL (C-367/95)