Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Eila Päivikki Maaheimo (C-333/00)
Judgment
The questions for preliminary ruling
The second question
33

Eila Päivikki Maaheimo (C-333/00)

Judgment of 7 Nov 2002law://eu/cjeu/2000/c-333-00/para_33@2026-11-10

33In such a case, the spouse of the worker is also entitled to rely on that article (see Hoever and Zachów, paragraph 38).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice
Case: C-333/00 · ECLI:EU:C:2002:641
Decided: 7 Nov 2002
Procedure: Preliminary reference
Defendant: Eila Päivikki Maaheimo
Rapporteur: N. Colneric
Advocate General: F.G. Jacobs
Bench: 4 judges
V. Skouris, F. Macken, N. Colneric, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62000CJ0333

Topics

Social security

History · 1 version

7 Nov 2002Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community
Cited by 7: Caisse nationale des prestations familiales v Fjola Hliddal (C‑216/12) and Pierre-Louis Bornand (C‑217/12) (C-216/12, C-217/12)2 provisions; Tiroler Gebietskrankenkasse v Michael Moser (C-32/18)2 provisions; European Commission v Slovak Republic (C-433/13); Caisse nationale des prestations familiales v Salim Lachheb and Nadia Lachheb (C-177/12)2 provisions; Commission of the European Communities v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-299/05); Christine Dodl and Petra Oberhollenzer v Tiroler Gebietskrankenkasse (C-543/03)2 provisions; Roger Noteboom v Rijksdienst voor Pensioenen (C-101/04)2 provisions
Cites 8: Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community; Anne Kuusijärvi v Riksförsäkringsverket (C-275/96); Rose Hughes v Chief Adjudication Officer, Belfast (C-78/91); Vincent Offermanns and Esther Offermanns (C-85/99); Ingrid Hoever and Iris Zachow v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen (C-245/94); Kurt Beeck v Bundesanstalt für Arbeit (C-104/80); Pascual Merino García v Bundesanstalt für Arbeit (C-266/95); Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 of 2 December 1996 amending and updating Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community and Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71