Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Commission of the European Communities v Camar Srl and Tico Srl (C-312/00 P)
Judgment
The appeal
Conditions of admissibility of an acti…
Findings of the Court
71

Commission of the European Communities v Camar Srl and Tico Srl (C-312/00 P)

Judgment of 10 Dec 2002law://eu/cjeu/2000/c-312-00/para_71@2026-11-10

71Since it thus puts in issue the legal conclusions which the Court of First Instance drew from that finding of fact, that ground of appeal must be declared admissible.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Full Court
Case: C-312/00 P · ECLI:EU:C:2002:736
Decided: 10 Dec 2002
Procedure: Appeal
Ruled invalid: 61996TJ0079
Applicant: Commission of the European Communities
Defendants: Camar Srl; Tico Srl; Council of the European Union
Rapporteur: R. Schintgen
Advocate General: C. Stix-Hackl
Bench: 14 judges
J.-P. Puissochet, M. Wathelet, R. Schintgen, C.W.A. Timmermans (Presidents of Chambers), C. Gulmann, D.A.O. Edward, A. La Pergola, P. Jann, V. Skouris, F. Macken, N. Colneric, S. von Bahr, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, A. Rosas
Language: Italian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62000CJ0312

Topics

Common commercial policy Common organisation of the markets

History · 1 version

10 Dec 2002Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Camar Srl and Tico srl v Commission of the European Communities and Council of the European Union (T-79/96)
Cited by 20: UU v Court of Justice of the European Union (T-84/24); Thomas Bindl v European Commission (T-354/22); Banca Popolare di Bari SpA v European Commission (T-415/21); "Sistem ecologica" production, trade and services d.o.o. Srbac v European Commission (T-81/21); OC v European Commission (T-384/20); QA v European Commission (T-68/21); Marc Folschette and Others v European Commission (T-884/19); John Dalli v European Commission (T-399/17); Council of the European Union v Marquis Energy LLC (C-466/16 P)2 provisions; Council of the European Union v Growth Energy and Renewable Fuels Association (C-465/16 P)2 provisions; Fruits de Ponent, SCCL v European Commission (T-290/16); Vakakis kai Synergates - Symvouloi gia Agrotiki Anaptixi AE Meleton, formerly Vakakis International - Symvouloi gia Agrotiki Anaptixi AE v European Commission (T-292/15); Acquafarm, SL v European Commission (T-458/16); European Ombudsman v Claire Staelen (C-337/15 P); Holistic Innovation Institute, SLU v Research Executive Agency (REA) (T-706/14); International Management Group (IMG) v European Commission (T-381/15); French Republic v European Commission (C-373/15 P)2 provisions; Athanassios Oikonomopoulos v European Commission (T-483/13); Agriconsulting Europe SA v European Commission (T-570/13)2 provisions; Randa Chart v European External Action Service (T-138/14)2 provisions
Cites 20: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Brasserie du Pêcheur SA v Bundesrepublik Deutschland and The Queen v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte: Factortame Ltd and others (C-46/93); Laboratoires pharmaceutiques Bergaderm SA and Jean-Jacques Goupil v Commission of the European Communities (C-352/98 P); John Deere Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-7/95); Erich Dillenkofer, Christian Erdmann, Hans-Jürgen Schulte, Anke Heuer, Werner, Ursula and Trosten Knor v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-178/94); Unión de Pequeños Agricultores v Council of the European Union (C-50/00 P); Salzgitter AG, formerly Preussag Stahl AG v Commission of the European Communities and Federal Republic of Germany (C-210/98 P); T. Port GmbH & Co. KG v Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung (C-68/95); Jean Lestelle v European Commission (C-30/91); European Investment Bank v Michel Hautem (C-449/99 P); Antillean Rice Mills NV v Council of the European Union (C-451/98); Camar Srl and Tico srl v Commission of the European Communities and Council of the European Union (T-79/96); Salomone Haim v Kassenzahnärztliche Vereinigung Nordrhein (C-424/97); Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 of 13 February 1993 on the common organization of the market in bananas; Kingdom of Belgium and Federal Republic of Germany v Commission of the European Communities (C-9/95); Norbrook Laboratories Ltd v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (C-127/95); Cordis Obst und Gemüse Großhandel GmbH v Commission of the European Communities and French Republic (C-442/99 P); Koninklijke Scholten Honig NV v Council and Commission of the European Communities (C-101/76); Camar Srl v Commission of the European Communities and Council of the European Union (T-260/97); The Queen v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, ex parte: Hedley Lomas (Ireland) Ltd (C-5/94)