Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Johann Franz Duchon v Pensionsversicherungsanstalt der Angestellten (C-290/00)
Judgment
The questions referred to the Court
The second question
28

Johann Franz Duchon v Pensionsversicherungsanstalt der Angestellten (C-290/00)

Judgment of 18 Apr 2002law://eu/cjeu/2000/c-290-00/para_28@2026-11-10

28In that respect, it is appropriate, as a first step, to review the legality of a provision such as Paragraph 235(3)(a) of the ASVG in the light of Community law as it would apply if the accident at work had occurred after the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Austria.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice
Case: C-290/00 · ECLI:EU:C:2002:234
Decided: 18 Apr 2002
Procedure: Preliminary reference
Ruled invalid: Regulation 1971/1408
Applicant: Johann Franz Duchon
Defendant: Pensionsversicherungsanstalt der Angestellten
Rapporteur: M. Wathelet
Advocate General: F.G. Jacobs
Bench: 2 judges
S. von Bahr, M. Wathelet
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62000CJ0290

Topics

Freedom of movement for workers Social security

History · 1 version

18 Apr 2002Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community
Cited by 9: Vasiliki Balazs v Casa Judeţeană de Pensii Cluj and Casa Judeţeană de Pensii Cluj v Attila Balazs (C-401/13, C-432/13); Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) v Tiziana Bruno and Massimo Pettini and Daniela Lotti and Clara Matteucci (C-395/08, C-396/08)2 provisions; BD v Sociálna poisťovňa, ústredie (C-717/24); Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank v F. Wieland and H. Rothwangl (C-465/14)3 provisions; Panasonic Italia SpA and Others v Agenzia delle Dogane di Milano (C-472/12); Janina Wencel v Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych w Białymstoku (C-589/10)2 provisions; Tomasz Ziolkowski and Barbara Szeja and Others v Land Berlin (C-424/10, C-425/10)2 provisions; Jörn Petersen v Landesgeschäftsstelle des Arbeitsmarktservice Niederösterreich (C-228/07); Marie-Nathalie D'Hoop v Office national de l'emploi (C-224/98)2 provisions
Cites 13: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community; Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Beata Pokrzeptowicz-Meyer (C-162/00); Liselotte Kauer v Pensionsversicherungsanstalt der Angestellten (C-28/00); Österreichischer Gewerkschaftsbund, Gewerkschaft öffentlicher Dienst v Republik Österreich (C-195/98); SA Ancienne Maison Marcel Bauche and SARL François Delquignies v Administration Française des Douanes (C-96/77); Assunta Licata v Economic and Social Committee (C-270/84); Herta Paschek v European Commission (C-40/79); Elissavet Paraschi v Landesversicherungsanstalt Württemberg (C-349/87); Koninklijke Scholten-Honig NV and De Verenigde Zetmeelbedrijven "De Bijenkorf" BV v Hoofdproduktschap voor Akkerbouwprodukten (C-125/77); Ludwig Rönfeldt v Bundesversicherungsanstalt für Angestellte (C-227/89); Gesamthochschule Duisburg v Hauptzollamt München - Mitte (C-234/83); Rijksdienst voor Pensioenen v Robert Engelbrecht (C-262/97)