Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Stichting ter Exploitatie van Naburige Rechten (SENA) v Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (NOS) (C-245/00)
Judgment
The first question
24

Stichting ter Exploitatie van Naburige Rechten (SENA) v Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (NOS) (C-245/00)

Judgment of 6 Feb 2003law://eu/cjeu/2000/c-245-00/para_24@2026-11-10

24That applies to the concept of equitable remuneration in Article 8(2) of Directive 92/100. Pursuant to the principle of the autonomy of Community law, it is a concept that must be interpreted uniformly in all Member States.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Sixth Chamber
Case: C-245/00 · ECLI:EU:C:2003:68
Decided: 6 Feb 2003
Procedure: Preliminary reference
Applicant: Stichting ter Exploitatie van Naburige Rechten (SENA)
Defendant: Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (NOS)
Rapporteur: Puissochet
Advocate General: A. Tizzano
Bench: 4 judges
C. Gulmann, V. Skouris, F. Macken, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62000CJ0245

Topics

Approximation of laws Copyright and related rights Freedom of establishment Freedom to provide services

History · 1 version

6 Feb 2003Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Council Directive 92/100/EEC of 19 November 1992 on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property
Cited by 15: Sociedad General de Autores y Editores de España (SGAE) v Rafael Hoteles SA (C-306/05)2 provisions; Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening (C-5/08); Funke Medien NRW GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-469/17); Spiegel Online GmbH v Volker Beck (C-516/17); Padawan SL v Sociedad General de Autores y Editores de España (SGAE) (C-467/08)2 provisions; Società Consortile Fonografici (SCF) v Marco Del Corso (C-135/10)2 provisions; Recorded Artists Actors Performers Ltd v Phonographic Performance (Ireland) Ltd and Others (C-265/19)2 provisions; Atresmedia Corporación de Medios de Comunicación S.A. v Asociación de Gestión de Derechos Intelectuales (AGEDI) and Artistas e Intérpretes o Ejecutantes, Sociedad de Gestión de España (AIE) (C-147/19); Eva-Maria Painer v Standard VerlagsGmbH and Others (C-145/10)2 provisions; DADA Music SRL and Uniunea Producătorilor de Fonograme din România (UPFR) v Asociaţia Radiourilor Locale şi Regionale (ARLR) (C-37/24); Vereniging van Educatieve en Wetenschappelijke Auteurs (VEWA) v Belgische Staat (C-271/10)2 provisions; Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain (C-36/05)2 provisions; Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic (C-53/05)2 provisions; Lagardère Active Broadcast v Société pour la perception de la rémunération équitable (SPRE) and Gesellschaft zur Verwertung von Leistungsschutzrechten mbH (GVL) (C-192/04)2 provisions; Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium (C-433/02)2 provisions
Cites 5: Council Directive 92/100/EEC of 19 November 1992 on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property; Ekro BV Vee- en Vleeshandel v Produktschap voor Vee en Vlees (C-327/82); Grand Duchy of Luxemburg v Berthe Linster, Aloyse Linster and Yvonne Linster (C-287/98); The Queen v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Nana Yaa Konadu Yiadom (C-357/98); Annalisa Carbonari and Others v Università degli studi di Bologna, Ministero della Sanità, Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca Scientifica and Ministero del Tesoro (C-131/97)