Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
SIAC Construction Ltd v County Council of the County of Mayo (C-19/00)
Judgment
The question submitted for preliminary…
33

SIAC Construction Ltd v County Council of the County of Mayo (C-19/00)

Judgment of 18 Oct 2001law://eu/cjeu/2000/c-19-00/para_33@2026-11-10

33In accordance with that objective, the duty to observe the principle of equal treatment of tenderers lies at the very heart of Directive 71/305, as amended (Case C-243/89 Commission v Denmark [1993] ECR I-3353, paragraph 33).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fifth Chamber
Case: C-19/00 · ECLI:EU:C:2001:553
Decided: 18 Oct 2001
Procedure: Preliminary reference
Applicant: SIAC Construction Ltd
Defendant: County Council of the County of Mayo
Rapporteur: Jann
Advocate General: EG. Jacobs
Bench: 4 judges
A. La Pergola, L. Sevon, M. Wathelet, C.W.A. Timmermans
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62000CJ0019

Topics

Approximation of laws Freedom of establishment Freedom to provide services

History · 1 version

18 Oct 2001Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Council Directive 71/305/EEC of 26 July 1971 concerning the co-ordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts
Cited by 20: Geos Atlas ltd. v EUCAP Somalia (T-300/24); Intering Sh.p.k and Others v European Commission (T-525/19); Sophia Group v European Parliament (T-578/19); SA Close and Cegelec v European Parliament (T-259/15); European Union Intellectual Property Office v European Dynamics Luxembourg SA and Others (C-677/15 P); Archus sp. z o.o. and Gama Jacek Lipik v Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo S.A (C-131/16)2 provisions; TNS Dimarso NV v Vlaams Gewest (C-6/15); Orange Business Belgium SA v European Commission (T-349/13); Vanbreda Risk & Benefits v European Commission (T-199/14)2 provisions; eVigilo Ltd v Priešgaisrinės apsaugos ir gelbėjimo departamentas prie Vidaus reikalų ministerijos (C-538/13)2 provisions; Alfastar Benelux SA v Council of the European Union (T-394/12); Evropaïki Dynamiki - Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission (T-340/09); European Dynamics Luxembourg SA and Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission (T-165/12)2 provisions; Evropaïki Dynamiki - Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission (T-457/10); Evropaïki Dynamiki - Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission (T-474/10); Nexans France v European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (T-415/10)2 provisions; Evropaïki Dynamiki - Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Food Safety Authority (T-457/07); Evropaïki Dynamiki - Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission (T-17/09); Evropaïki Dynamiki - Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission (T-554/08); Ministre de l’Intérieur, de l’Outre-mer, des Collectivités territoriales et de l’Immigration v Chambre de commerce et d'industrie de l'Indre (C-465/10)
Cites 9: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); The Queen v Secretary of State for Home Department, ex parte Evans Medical Ltd and Macfarlan Smith Ltd (C-324/93); Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Denmark (C-243/89); Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium (C-87/94); Council Directive 71/305/EEC of 26 July 1971 concerning the co-ordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts; The Queen v H.M. Treasury, ex parte The University of Cambridge (C-380/98); Gebroeders Beentjes BV v State of the Netherlands (C-31/87); Unitron Scandinavia A/S and 3-S A/S, Danske Svineproducenters Serviceselskab v Ministeriet for Fødevarer, Landbrug og Fiskeri (C-275/98); Council Directive 89/440/EEC of 18 July 1989 amending Directive 71/305/EEC concerning coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts