Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Eugen Schmidberger, Internationale Transporte und Planzüge v Republik Österreich (C-112/00)
Judgment
The questions referred for a prelimina…
Whether the restriction may be justified
73

Eugen Schmidberger, Internationale Transporte und Planzüge v Republik Österreich (C-112/00)

Judgment of 12 Jun 2003law://eu/cjeu/2000/c-112-00/para_73@2026-11-10

73It follows that measures which are incompatible with observance of the human rights thus recognised are not acceptable in the Community (see, inter alia, ERT, cited above, paragraph 41, and Case C-299/95 Kremzow [1997] ECR I-2629, paragraph 14).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Full Court
Case: C-112/00 · ECLI:EU:C:2003:333
Decided: 12 Jun 2003
Procedure: Preliminary reference
Applicant: Eugen Schmidberger, Internationale Transporte und Planzüge
Defendant: Republik Österreich
Rapporteur: R. Schintgen(Presidents of Chambers)
Advocate General: F.G. Jacobs
Bench: 12 judges
J.-P. Puissochet, M. Wathelet, R. Schintgen(Presidents of Chambers), C. Gulmann, D.A.O. Edward, P. Jann, V. Skouris, F. Macken, N. Colneric, S. von Bahr, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, A. Rosas
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62000CJ0112

Topics

Measures having equivalent effect Principles of Union law

History · 1 version

12 Jun 2003Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)5 provisions
Cited by 19: Tele2 Sverige AB v Post- och telestyrelsen and Secretary of State for the Home Department v Tom Watson and Others (C-203/15); Vera Egenberger v Evangelisches Werk für Diakonie und Entwicklung e.V (C-414/16); XC and Others v Generalprokuratur (C-234/17)2 provisions; Pál Aranyosi and Robert Căldăraru v Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Bremen (C-404/15, C-659/15 PPU); Ålands vindkraft AB v Energimyndigheten (C-573/12); Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH v kohlpharma GmbH (C-204/20); Ute Kleinsteuber v Mars GmbH (C-354/16); Archus sp. z o.o. and Gama Jacek Lipik v Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo S.A (C-131/16)2 provisions; OTP Bank Nyrt. v Magyar Állam and Magyar Államkincstár (C-672/13); Raffinerie Heide GmbH v European Commission (T-631/13); Molda AG v European Commission (T-629/13); DK Recycling und Roheisen GmbH v European Commission (T-630/13); Romonta GmbH v European Commission (T-614/13)2 provisions; Arctic Paper Mochenwangen GmbH v European Commission (T-634/13); European Commission v Republic of Austria (C-28/09); Bank Melli Iran v Council of the European Union (C-548/09 P)2 provisions; Unió de Pagesos de Catalunya v Administración del Estado (C-197/10)2 provisions; Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze and Agenzia delle Entrate v Paint Graphos Soc. coop. arl, Adige Carni Soc. coop. arl, in liquidation v Agenzia delle Entrate and Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze and Ministero delle Finanze v Michele Franchetto (C-78/08, C-79/08, C-80/08)2 provisions; Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) v European Commission (T-68/08)
Cites 19: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)7 provisions; Bernard Connolly v European Commission (C-274/99); Union royale belge des sociétés de football association ASBL v Jean-Marc Bosman, Royal club liégeois SA v Jean-Marc Bosman and others and Union des associations européennes de football (UEFA) v Jean-Marc Bosman (C-415/93); PreussenElektra AG v Schhleswag AG, in the presence of Windpark Reußenköge III GmbH and Land Schleswig-Holstein (C-379/98); Procureur du Roi v Benoît and Gustave Dassonville (C-8/74); Wienand Meilicke v ADV/ORGA F. A. Meyer AG (C-83/91); Roquette Frères SA v Directeur général de la concurrence, de la consommation et de la répression des fraudes, and Commission of the European Communities (C-94/00); Meryem Demirel v Stadt Schwäbisch Gmünd (C-12/86); Bacardi-Martini SAS and Cellier des Dauphins v Newcastle United Football Company Ltd (C-318/00); Criminal proceedings against Paul der Weduwe (C-153/00); Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany (C-62/90); Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (C-265/95); Vereinigte Familiapress Zeitungsverlags- und vertriebs GmbH v Heinrich Bauer Verlag (C-368/95); Friedrich Kremzow v Republik Österreich (C-299/95); Baumbast and R v Secretary of State for the Home Department (C-413/99); Krystyna Gmurzynska-Bscher v Oberfinanzdirektion Köln (C-231/89); Massam Dzodzi v Belgian State (C-297/88); X v European Commission (C-404/92); Elliniki Radiophonia Tiléorassi AE and Panellinia Omospondia Syllogon Prossopikou v Dimotiki Etairia Pliroforissis and Sotirios Kouvelas and Nicolaos Avdellas and others (C-260/89)