Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-403/99)
Judgment
Substance
The first plea in law
Findings of the Court
35

Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-403/99)

Judgment of 4 Oct 2001law://eu/cjeu/1999/c-403-99/para_35@2026-11-11

35However, the general principle of protection of legitimate expectations was as binding on the Council when it adopted Regulations Nos 2799/98 and 2800/98 as it was on the Commission when it implemented them.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice
Case: C-403/99 · ECLI:EU:C:2001:507
Decided: 4 Oct 2001
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Italian Republic
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Rapporteur: P. Jann
Advocate General: D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer
Bench: 4 judges
D.A.O. Edward, P. Jann, S. von Bahr, C.W.A. Timmermans
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 61999CJ0403

Topics

Monetary measures in the field of agriculture

History · 1 version

4 Oct 2001Reading

Connections

Cited by 12: I. SA v S. J (C-410/23); Christopher Sturgeon, Gabriel Sturgeon and Alana Sturgeon v Condor Flugdienst GmbH and Stefan Böck and Cornelia Lepuschitz v Air France SA (C-402/07); RWE Supply & Trading GmbH v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (T-95/23); Uniper Global Commodities SE v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (T-96/23); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (T-28/22); Deutsche Telekom AG v European Commission (T-207/10)2 provisions; Hungary v European Commission (T-346/12)2 provisions; Commission of the European Communities v Koninklijke FrieslandCampina NV (C-519/07); Feinchemie Schwebda GmbH and Bayer CropScience AG v College voor de toelating van bestrijdingsmiddelen (C-361/06); Dieter Wils v European Parliament (F-105/05); Stichting Zuid-Hollandse Milieufederatie and Stichting Natuur en Milieu v College voor de toelating van bestrijdingsmiddelen (C-174/05); Land Baden-Württemberg v Günther Schilling and Bezirksregierung Lüneburg v Hans-Otto Nehring (C-63/00)2 provisions
Cites 7: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (C-434/97); Commission Regulation (EC) No 1410/1999 of 29 June 1999 amending Regulation (EC) No 2808/98 laying down detailed rules for the application of the agrimonetary system for the euro in agriculture and amending the definition of certain operative events provided for in Regulations (EEC) No 3889/87, (EEC) No 3886/92, (EEC) No 1793/93, (EEC) No 2700/93 and (EC) No 293/98; Council Regulation (EC) No 2799/98 of 15 December 1998 establishing agrimonetary arrangements for the euro; Commission Regulation (EC) No 2813/98 of 22 December 1998 laying down detailed rules for applying the transitional measures for the introduction of the euro to the common agricultural policy; Commission of the European Communities v Council of the European Union (C-122/94); Council Regulation (EC) No 2800/98 of 15 December 1998 on transitional measures to be applied under the common agricultural policy with a view to the introduction of the euro