22The Court has ruled that, where a regulation which introduces an antidumping duty imposes different duties on a series of undertakings, an undertaking is individually concerned only by those provisions which impose on it a specific antidumping duty and determine the amount thereof, and not by those provisions which impose antidumping duties on other undertakings, with the result that an action brought by that undertaking will be admissible only in so faias it seeks the annulment of those provisions of the regulation that exclusively concern it (Case 240/84 Toyo v Council [1987] ECR 1809, paragraphs 6 and 7; Case 255/84 Nachi Fujikoshi v Council [1987] ECR 1861, paragraphs 7 and 8; Case 256/84 Koyo Seiko v Council [1987] ECR 1899, paragraphs 6 and 7; and Case 258/84 Nippon Seiko v Council [1987] ECR 1923, paragraphs 7 and 8).
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.