Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (C-237/99)
Judgment
Substance
Findings of the Court
59

Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (C-237/99)

Judgment of 1 Feb 2001law://eu/cjeu/1999/c-237-99/para_59@2026-11-10

59It follows from all the provisions referred to in paragraphs 51 to 58 of the present judgment that the management of SA HLMs is subject to supervision by the public authorities which allows the latter to influence the decisions of the SA HLMs in relation to public contracts.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice
Case: C-237/99 · ECLI:EU:C:2001:70
Decided: 1 Feb 2001
Procedure: Infringement action
Applicant: Commission of the European Communities
Defendant: French Republic
Rapporteur: P. Jann
Advocate General: J. Mischo
Bench: 4 judges
M. Wathelet, D.A.O. Edward, P. Jann, L. Sevón
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 61999CJ0237

Topics

Approximation of laws Freedom of establishment Freedom to provide services

History · 1 version

1 Feb 2001Reading

Connections

Cited by 11: Federazione Italiana Giuoco Calcio (FIGC) and Consorzio Ge.Se.Av. S. c. arl v De Vellis Servizi Globali Srl (C-155/19, C-156/19)2 provisions; Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (T-402/06)2 provisions; IVD GmbH & Co. KG v Ärztekammer Westfalen-Lippe (C-526/11)2 provisions; Michaniki AE v Ethniko Symvoulio Radiotileorasis and Ypourgos Epikrateias (C-213/07); Ing. Aigner, Wasser-Wärme-Umwelt, GmbH v Fernwärme Wien GmbH (C-393/06); Bayerischer Rundfunk and Others v GEWA - Gesellschaft für Gebäudereinigung und Wartung mbH (C-337/06)2 provisions; Arkkitehtuuritoimisto Riitta Korhonen Oy, Arkkitehtitoimisto Pentti Toivanen Oy and Rakennuttajatoimisto Vilho Tervomaa v Varkauden Taitotalo Oy (C-18/01); Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain (C-214/00)2 provisions; Adolf Truley GmbH v Bestattung Wien GmbH (C-373/00)3 provisions; Universale-Bau AG, Bietergemeinschaft: 1) Hinteregger & Söhne Bauges.m.b.H. Salzburg, 2) ÖSTÜ-STETTIN Hoch- und Tiefbau GmbH v Entsorgungsbetriebe Simmering GmbH (C-470/99)2 provisions; Impresa Lombardini SpA - Impresa Generale di Costruzioni v ANAS - Ente nazionale per le strade and Società Italiana per Condotte d'Acqua SpA and Impresa Ing. Mantovani SpA v ANAS - Ente nazionale per le strade and Ditta Paolo Bregoli (C-285/99, C-286/99)2 provisions
Cites 5: Gemeente Arnhem and Gemeente Rheden v BFI Holding BV (C-360/96); Council Directive 93/37/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts; Mannesmann Anlagenbau Austria AG and Others v Strohal Rotationsdruck GesmbH (C-44/96); The Queen v H.M. Treasury, ex parte The University of Cambridge (C-380/98); Commission of the European Communities v Ireland (C-353/96)