Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Mannesmannröhren-Werke AG v Commission of the European Communities (T-112/98)
Judgment
Substance
Arguments of the parties
The second plea, alleging infringement…
43

Mannesmannröhren-Werke AG v Commission of the European Communities (T-112/98)

Judgment of 20 Feb 2001law://eu/cjeu/1998/t-112-98/para_43@2026-11-12

43Thirdly, the applicant maintains that the principles laid down in Orkem were not confirmed either in the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-60/92 Otto [1993] ECR I-5683 or in the judgment in Société Générale.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · First Chamber, sitting with five Judges
Case: T-112/98 · ECLI:EU:T:2001:61
Decided: 20 Feb 2001
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Mannesmannröhren-Werke AG
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Rapporteur: Vesterdorf
Bench: 4 judges
A. Potocki, A.W.H. Meij, M. Vilaras, N.J. Forwood
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 61998TJ0112

Topics

Agreements, decisions and concerted practices

History · 1 version

20 Feb 2001Reading

Connections

Cited by 16: Commission of the European Communities v SGL Carbon AG (C-301/04); Qualcomm, Inc. and Qualcomm Europe, Inc. v European Commission (T-371/17); Schunk GmbH and Schunk Kohlenstoff-Technik GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (T-69/04); AC-Treuhand AG v Commission of the European Communities (T-99/04); Salzgitter Mannesmann GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-411/04 P)4 provisions; Raiffeisen Zentralbank Österreich AG and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-259/02, T-260/02, T-261/02, T-262/02, T-263/02, T-264/02, T-271/02)2 provisions; Jungbunzlauer AG v Commission of the European Communities (T-43/02)2 provisions; Archer Daniels Midland Co. v Commission of the European Communities (T-59/02)2 provisions; Roquette Frères SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-322/01); Dr. Hans Heubach GmbH & Co. KG v Commission of the European Communities (T-64/02); Sumitomo Chemical Co. Ltd and Sumika Fine Chemicals Co. Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (T-22/02, T-23/02)2 provisions; JFE Engineering Corp., formerly NKK Corp., Nippon Steel Corp., JFE Steel Corp. and Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (T-67/00, T-68/00, T-71/00, T-78/00); Dalmine SpA v Commission of the European Communities (T-50/00); Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (T-198/01); Mannesmannröhren-Werke AG v Commission of the European Communities (T-44/00)2 provisions; Tokai Carbon Co. Ltd and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-236/01, T-239/01, T-244/01, T-245/01, T-246/01, T-251/01, T-252/01)2 provisions
Cites 13: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Dieter Krombach v André Bamberski (C-7/98); Marguerite Johnston v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary (222/84); Orkem v Commission of the European Communities (374/87); Baustahlgewebe GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-185/95 P); Opinion pursuant to Article 228 of the EC Treaty (Opinion 2/94); EEC Council: Regulation No 17: First Regulation implementing Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty; Dirección General de Defensa de la Competencia v Asociación Española de Banca Privada and others (C-67/91); Société Générale v Commission of the European Communities (T-34/93); Friedrich Kremzow v Republik Österreich (C-299/95); Mayr-Melnhof Kartongesellschaft mbH v Commission of the European Communities (T-347/94); Otto BV v Postbank NV (C-60/92); Solvay & Cie v Commission of the European Communities (C-27/88)