16With respect to the first plea in law made by Ca' Pasta, the Court held as follows:24 According to settled case-law, any measure which produces binding legal effects such as to affect the interests of an applicant by bringing about a distinct change in his legal position is an act or decision which may be the subject of an action under Article 173 for a declaration that it is void (see, for example, Case T-154/94 CSF and CSME v Commission [1996] ECR II-1377, at paragraph 37).25 In the case of acts or decisions drawn up in a procedure involving several stagOficemen v Commission [1997] ECR II-1161, paragraph 53).26 In the letter at issue, the Commission informed the applicant of the “continuation of the internal procedure with a view to cancelling the contribution [granted to the applicant] and recovering the amount already paid”.27 That wording shows clearly that the Commission had not yet taken a final decision on the discontinuance of the financial aid granted to the applicant, but that it was preparing such a decision.28 The letter is therefore not a measure which produces binding legal effects such as to affect the interests of the applicant by bringing about a distinct change in his legal position within the meaning of the judgment in CSF and CSME v Commission, cited above. As the Commission rightly maintains, it is merely a letter providing information.’
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.