Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

European Union
Arnaldo Lucaccioni v European Commission (C-257/98 P)
Judgment
The first limb of the plea
14

Arnaldo Lucaccioni v European Commission (C-257/98 P)

law://eu/cjeu/1998/c-257-98/para_14@2026-11-13

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-257/98 P · ECLI:EU:C:1999:402
Decided: 9 Sept 1999
Procedure: Appeal
Applicant: Arnaldo Lucaccioni
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Rapporteur: L. Sevón
Advocate General: S. Alber
Bench: 2 judges
D.A.O. Edward, L. Sevón
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 61998CJ0257

Topics

Staff Regulations of Officials

History · 1 version

9 Sept 1999Reading

Judgment of 9 Sept 1999

14In so far as those three conditions must be satisfied cumulatively, the fact that one of them has not been satisfied is a sufficient basis on which to dismiss an action for damages.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Connections

Cited by 21: EP v European Parliament (T-370/24); Maya Tokareva v Council of the European Union (T-269/24); Thomas Bindl v European Commission (T-354/22)2 provisions; Keserű Művek Fegyvergyár Kft. v European Union, represented by the European Commission (T-519/23); Maya Tokareva v Council of the European Union (T-744/22); Symphony Environmental Technologies plc and Symphony Environmental Ltd v European Parliament and Others (T-745/20); BZ v European Central Bank (T-162/21); SE v European Commission (T-223/21)2 provisions; Vialto Consulting Kft. v European Commission (T-537/18); KD v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-298/20); ASL Aviation Holdings DAC and ASL Airlines (Ireland) Ltd v European Commission (T-540/18); United Parcel Service, Inc. v European Commission (T-834/17); Zoi Apostolopoulou and Anastasia Apostolopoulou-Chrysanthaki v European Commission (T-721/18); Dyson Ltd and Others v European Commission (T-127/19); DK v European External Action Service (C-851/19 P); Naser Bateni v Council of the European Union (T-455/17)2 provisions; Sergio Spadafora v European Commission (T-130/19); Lars Helbert v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-548/18)2 provisions; George Haswani v Council of the European Union (T-521/19); José Manuel Pinto Teixeira v European External Action Service (T-667/18); Stefano Missir Mamachi di Lusignano, as heir to Livio Missir Mamachi di Lusignano and Others v European Commission (T-502/16)
Cites 12: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Raimund Vidrányi v European Commission (C-283/90 P); Ojha v European Commission (T-36/93); San Marco Impex Italiana Srl v Commission of the European Communities (C-19/95); Arnaldo Lucaccioni v European Commission (T-165/95); Maria Brummelhuis and Others v European Commission (169/83, 136/84); Smanor SA, Hubert Ségaud and Monique Ségaud v Commission of the European Communities (C-317/97); Giorgio Bernardi v European Parliament (C-303/96); Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 of the Council of 29 February 1968 laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities and instituting special measures temporarily applicable to officials of the Commission (Staff Regulations of Officials); European Commission v Augusto Brazzelli Lualdi (C-136/92 P); John Deere Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-7/95 P); Council of the European Union v Lieve de Nil and Christiane Impens (C-259/96 P)