Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

European Union
Mehibas Dordtselaan BV v Commission of the European Communities (T-290/97)
Judgment
Substance
Third plea: breach of Article 13 of Re…
Arguments of the parties
—Whether there is a special situation
70

Mehibas Dordtselaan BV v Commission of the European Communities (T-290/97)

law://eu/cjeu/1997/t-290-97/para_70@2026-11-13

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

Key facts

Court: General Court · Fifth Chamber
Case: T-290/97 · ECLI:EU:T:2000:8
Decided: 18 Jan 2000
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Mehibas Dordtselaan BV, a company incorporated under Netherlands law, established in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, represented by Pierre Bos, Jasper Helder and Marco Slotboom, of the Rotterdam Bar, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the Chambers of Marc Loesch, 11 Rue Goethe
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities, represented by Hendrik van Lier, of its Legal Service, acting as Agent, assisted by Jules Stuyck, of the Brussels Bar, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the office of Carlos Gómez de la Cruz, of its Legal Service, Wagner Centre, Kirchberg
Rapporteur: Cooke
Bench: 2 judges
R. Garcia-Valdecasas, P. Lindh
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 61997TJ0290

Topics

Common organisation of the markets Own resources

History · 1 version

18 Jan 2000Reading

Judgment of 18 Jan 2000

70Furthermore, in Case C-250/91 Hewlett Packard France [1993] ECR I-1819, paragraph 46, the Court held that the conditions for Article 13 of Regulation No 1430/79 to apply were to be assessed in the light of the conditions laid down in Article 5(2) of Regulation No 1697/79. It concludes that the Commission is bound to grant a request for repayment under Article 13 of Regulation No 1430/79 where the applicant relies on circumstances analogous to those considered relevant for the purposes of Article 5(2) of Regulation No 1697/79.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Connections

Cited by 19: Republic of Slovenia v European Commission (T-626/17); Eurofast SARL v European Commission (T-87/16); Ente nazionale per l'aviazione civile (ENAC) v Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA) (T-695/13); Hungary v European Commission (T-662/14); Republic of Poland v European Commission (T-367/13); Italian Republic v European Commission (T-358/13)2 provisions; Republic of Poland v European Commission (T-290/12)2 provisions; Schenker Customs Agency BV v European Commission (T-576/11)2 provisions; Republic of Poland v European Commission (T-257/13); Laufen Austria AG v European Commission (T-411/10); Roca v European Commission (T-412/10); Republic of Bulgaria v European Commission (T-335/11); Firma Léon Van Parys NV v European Commission (T-324/10)2 provisions; Fresh Del Monte Produce, Inc. v European Commission (T-587/08)2 provisions; Séverine Scheefer v European Parliament (F-41/12); Applied Microengineering Ltd v European Commission (T-387/09)2 provisions; Evropaïki Dynamiki - Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission (T-554/08); Kalliope Agapiou Joséphidès v European Commission and Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) (T-439/08); CSL Behring GmbH v European Commission and European Medicines Agency (EMA) (T-264/07)
Cites 23: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Council Regulation (EEC) No 1430/79 of 2 July 1979 on the repayment or remission of import or export duties; Antillean Rice Mills NV, Trading & Shipping Co. Ter Beek BV, European Rice Brokers AVV, Alesie Curaçao NV and Guyana Investments AVV v Commission of the European Communities (T-480/93, T-483/93); Embassy Limousines & Services v European Parliament (T-203/96); Commission of the European Communities v Lisrestal - Organização Gestão de Restaurantes Colectivos Ldª, Gabinete Técnico de Informática Ldª (GTI), Lisnico - Serviço Marítimo Internacional Ldª, Rebocalis - Rebocagem e Assistência Marítima Ldª and Gaslimpo - Sociedade de Desgasificação de Navios SA (C-32/95 P); Kingdom of the Netherlands, Koninklijke PTT Nederland NV and PTT Post BV v Commission of the European Communities (C-48/90, C-66/90); Foreningen af Jernskibs- og Maskinbyggerier i Danmark, Skibsværftsforeningen, Assens Skibsværft A/S, Burmeister & Wain Skibsværft A/S, Danyard A/S, Fredericia Skibsværft A/S, Odense Staalskibsværft A/S, Svendborg Værft A/S, Ørskov Christensens Staalskibsværft A/S and Aarhus Flydedok A/S v Commission of the European Communities (T-266/94); Sofrimport SARL v Commission of the European Communities (C-152/88); Vereniging van Exporteurs in Levende Varkens and others and Nederlandse Bond van Waaghouders van Levend Vee and others v Commission of the European Communities (T-481/93, T-484/93); Van den Bergh en Jurgens BV and Van Dijk Food Products (Lopik) BV v Commission of the European Communities (265/85); Heintz van Landewyck SARL and Others v Commission of the European Communities (209/78, 210/78, 211/78, 212/78, 213/78, 214/78, 215/78, 218/78); Eyckeler & Malt AG v Commission of the European Communities (T-42/96); Primex Produkte Import-Export GmbH & Co. KG, Gebr. Kruse GmbH, Interporc Im- und Export GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (T-50/96); CT Control (Rotterdam) BV and JCT Benelux BV v Commission of the European Communities (C-121/91, C-122/91); Council Regulation (EEC) No 1697/79 of 24 July 1979 on the post-clearance recovery of import duties or export duties which have not been required of the person liable for payment on goods entered for a customs procedure involving the obligation to pay such duties; De Haan Beheer BV v Inspecteur der Invoerrechten en Accijnzen te Rotterdam (C-61/98); Günzler Aluminium GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (T-75/95); Edouard Dubois et Fils SA v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities (T-113/96); Hewlett Packard France v Directeur Général des Douanes (C-250/91); Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code; Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV, Elf Atochem SA, BASF AG, Shell International Chemical Company Ltd, DSM NV, DSM Kunststoffen BV, Wacker-Chemie GmbH, Hoechst AG, Société artésienne de vinyle, Montedison SpA, Imperial Chemical Industries plc, Hüls AG and Enichem SpA v Commission of the European Communities (T-305/94, T-306/94, T-307/94, T-313/94, T-314/94, T-315/94, T-316/94, T-318/94, T-325/94, T-328/94, T-329/94, T-335/94); France-aviation v Commission of the European Communities (T-346/94); Kingdom of Belgium v Commission of the European Communities (C-142/87)