Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Salomon SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-123/97)
Judgment
Substance
The first plea: the Aid was not a sing…
75

Salomon SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-123/97)

law://eu/cjeu/1997/t-123-97/para_75@2026-11-13

Key facts

Court: General Court · Second Chamber, sitting with five Judges
Case: T-123/97 · ECLI:EU:T:1999:245
Decided: 6 Oct 1999
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Salomon SA
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Rapporteur: Potocki
Bench: 4 judges
K. Lenaerts, C.W. Bellamy, J. Azizi, A.W.H. Meij
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 61997TJ0123

Topics

History · 1 version

6 Oct 1999Reading

Judgment of 6 Oct 1999

75Since they are part of the restructuring plan approved by the Decision, their payment in successive tranches does not change the nature of the Aid as a single package.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Connections

Cited by 16: Zásilkovna s. r. o. v European Commission (T-784/22); Scandlines Danmark ApS and Scandlines Deutschland GmbH v European Commission (T-390/20)2 provisions; Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd, formerly Facebook Ireland Ltd v European Commission (T-452/20); Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd, formerly Facebook Ireland Ltd v European Commission (T-451/20); Frucona Košice a.s. v European Commission (T-11/07); Kahla/Thüringen Porzellan GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (T-20/03); Walter Deffaa v European Commission (F-125/06); Tirrenia di Navigazione SpA and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-246/99); Ter Lembeek International NV v Commission of the European Communities (T-217/02)2 provisions; British Aggregates Association v Commission of the European Communities (T-210/02)2 provisions; Schmitz-Gotha Fahrzeugwerke GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (T-17/03)2 provisions; Corsica Ferries France SAS v Commission of the European Communities (T-349/03)2 provisions; Saxonia Edelmetalle GmbH and Zeitzer Maschinen, Anlagen Geräte (ZEMAG) GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (T-111/01, T-133/01)2 provisions; Valmont Nederland BV v Commission of the European Communities (T-274/01)2 provisions; Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (T-198/01)2 provisions; Audi AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-16/02)2 provisions
Cites 9: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; British Aerospace Public Ltd Company and Rover Group Holdings plc v Commission of the European Communities (C-294/90); Breda Fucine Meridionali SpA (BFM) and Ente partecipazioni e finanziamento industria manifatturiera (EFIM) v Commission of the European Communities (T-126/96, T-127/96); European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (85/85); British Airways plc, Scandinavian Airlines System Denmark-Norway-Sweden, Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV, Air UK Ltd, Euralair international, TAT European Airlines SA and British Midland Airways Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (T-371/94, T-394/94); Preussag Stahl AG v Commission of the European Communities (T-129/96); Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities (C-278/92, C-279/92, C-280/92); Forges de Clabecq SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-37/97); Cityflyer Express Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (T-16/96)