Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Unifrigo Gadus Srl and CPL Imperial 2 SpA v Commission of the European Communities (T-10/97, T-11/97)
Judgment
The claim for compensation
Arguments of the parties
89

Unifrigo Gadus Srl and CPL Imperial 2 SpA v Commission of the European Communities (T-10/97, T-11/97)

Judgment of 9 Jun 1998law://eu/cjeu/1997/t-10-97/para_89@2026-11-12

89The applicants deny that the claim for compensation is inadmissible, as alleged by the Commission (judgment of the Court of First Instance in Case T-485/93 Dreyfus v Commission [1996] ECR II-1101, paragraph 73).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Third Chamber
Cases: T-10/97, T-11/97 · ECLI:EU:T:1998:118
Decided: 9 Jun 1998
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicants: Unifrigo Gadus Sri; and; CPL Imperial 2 SpA
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Rapporteur: Potocki
Bench: 2 judges
C. P. Briët, A. Potocki
Language: Italian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 61997TJ0010

Topics

Customs Union and Common Customs Tariff Own resources

History · 1 version

9 Jun 1998Reading

Connections

Cited by 4: Firma Léon Van Parys NV v European Commission (T-324/10)2 provisions; DSV Road NV v Commission of the European Communities (T-219/07); Hyper Srl v Commission of the European Communities (T-205/99)2 provisions; this act2 provisions
Cites 13: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; The Queen v Commissioners of Customs & Excise, ex parte Faroe Seafood Co. Ltd, Føroya Fiskasøla L/F and Commissioners of Customs & Excise, ex parte John Smith and Celia Smith trading as Arthur Smith (a firm) (C-153/94, C-204/94); Council Regulation (EEC) No 1697/79 of 24 July 1979 on the post-clearance recovery of import duties or export duties which have not been required of the person liable for payment on goods entered for a customs procedure involving the obligation to pay such duties; SA Sermes v Directeur des services des douanes de Strasbourg (C-323/88); Société Louis Dreyfus & Cie v Commission of the European Communities (T-485/93); Hauptzollamt Gießen v Deutsche Fernsprecher GmbH (C-64/89); Gebrüder Weis GmbH v Hauptzollamt Würzburg (C-292/91); Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code; Krohn & Co. Import - Export GmbH & Co. KG v Commission of the European Communities (175/84); Criminal proceedings against Edmond Huygen and others (C-12/92); Mecanarte - Metalúrgica da Lagoa Ldª v Chefe do Serviço da Conferência Final da Alfândega do Porto (C-348/89); CT Control (Rotterdam) BV and JCT Benelux BV v Commission of the European Communities (C-121/91, C-122/91); Pascoal & Filhos Ldª v Fazenda Pública (C-97/95)