21In that regard, it must be observed that the Court of First Instance found, in paragraph 19 of the contested judgment, that ‘notwithstanding the wording of the first plea in law, which refers only to Article 25 of the Staff Regulations’, Mrs Gaspari's arguments in support of this plea ‘are in fact intended to show also that her rights of defence were infringed in that, despite her request to that effect, her attending medical practitioner did not receive the report of the medical officer on which the contested decision is based’. Accordingly, the plea was not new but was properly expressed in different terms by the Court of First Instance.