Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Giuseppe Manfredi v Regione Puglia (C-308/97)
Judgment
The question referred
30

Giuseppe Manfredi v Regione Puglia (C-308/97)

Judgment of 25 Nov 1998law://eu/cjeu/1997/c-308-97/para_30@2026-11-10

30In those circumstances, that recital cannot be relied upon to interpret Article 6(1) of Regulation No 822/87, as amended by Regulation No 1325/90, in a manner clearly contrary to its wording.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Sixth Chamber
Case: C-308/97 · ECLI:EU:C:1998:566
Decided: 25 Nov 1998
Procedure: Preliminary reference
Applicant: Giuseppe Manfredi
Defendant: Regione Puglia
Rapporteur: Kapteyn
Advocate General: D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer
Bench: 4 judges
G. Hirsch, G. F. Mancini, H. Ragnemalm, K. M. Ioannou
Language: Italian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 61997CJ0308

Topics

Common organisation of the markets

History · 1 version

25 Nov 1998Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Council Regulation (EEC) No 822/87 of 16 March 1987 on the common organization of the market in wine
Cited by 4: European Citizens' Initiative One of Us and Others v European Commission (T-561/14)2 provisions; Oreste Della Rocca v Poste Italiane SpA (C-290/12)2 provisions; Fabio Caronna (C-7/11)2 provisions; Deutsches Milch-Kontor GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas (C-136/04)2 provisions
Cites 9: Council Regulation (EEC) No 822/87 of 16 March 1987 on the common organization of the market in wine; Council Regulation (EC) No 1595/96 of 30 July 1996 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1442/88 on the granting, for the 1988/89 to 1995/96 wine years, of permanent abandonment premiums in respect of wine-growing areas; Council Regulation (EEC) No 1442/88 of 24 May 1988 on the granting, for the 1988/89 to 1995/96 wine years, of permanent abandonment premiums in respect of wine- growing areas; Council Regulation (EEC) No 337/79 of 5 February 1979 on the common organization of the market in wine; Council Regulation (EEC) No 1208/84 of 27 April 1984 amending Regulation (EEC) No 337/79 on the common organization of the market in wine; Council Regulation (EEC) No 454/80 of 18 February 1980 amending Regulation (EEC) No 337/79 on the common organization of the market in wine and Regulation (EEC) No 338/79 laying down special provisions for quality wines produced in specified regions; Council Regulation (EC) No 1592/96 of 30 July 1996 amending Regulation (EEC) No 822/87 on the common organization of the market in wine; Giuseppe Manfredi v Regione Puglia (C-308/97); Council Regulation (EEC) No 1325/90 of 14 May 1990 amending Regulation (EEC) No 822/87 on the Common Organization of the market in wine