Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Josef Köllensperger GmbH & Co. KG and Atzwanger AG v Gemeindeverband Bezirkskrankenhaus Schwaz (C-103/97)
Judgment
Admissibility of the questions referre…
16

Josef Köllensperger GmbH & Co. KG and Atzwanger AG v Gemeindeverband Bezirkskrankenhaus Schwaz (C-103/97)

Judgment of 4 Feb 1999law://eu/cjeu/1997/c-103-97/para_16@2026-11-10

16It must first be considered whether the Tiroler Landesvergabeamt is a court or tribunal within the meaning of Article 1 77 of the Treaty, and consequently whether the questions are admissible.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Sixth Chamber
Case: C-103/97 · ECLI:EU:C:1999:52
Decided: 4 Feb 1999
Procedure: Preliminary reference
Applicants: Josef Köllensperger GmbH&Co. KG; Atzwanger AG
Defendant: Gemeindeverband Bezirkskrankenhaus Schwaz
Rapporteur: Kapteyn
Advocate General: A. Saggio
Bench: 4 judges
G. Hirsch, G. F. Mancini, H. Ragnemalm, R. Schintgen
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 61997CJ0103

Topics

Approximation of laws

History · 1 version

4 Feb 1999Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Council Directive 89/665/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts
Cited by 6: Graham J. Wilson v Ordre des avocats du barreau de Luxembourg (C-506/04)2 provisions; Consorci Sanitari del Maresme v Corporació de Salut del Maresme i la Selva (C-203/14)2 provisions; Synetairismos Farmakopoion Aitolias & Akarnanias (Syfait) and Others v GlaxoSmithKline plc and GlaxoSmithKline AEVE (C-53/03)2 provisions; Hospital Ingenieure Krankenhaustechnik Planungs-Gesellschaft mbH (HI) v Stadt Wien (C-92/00)2 provisions; Walter Schmid (C-516/99)2 provisions; Hospital Ingenieure Krankenhaustechnik Planungs-Gesellschaft mbH (HI) v Landeskrankenanstalten-Betriebsgesellschaft (C-258/97)2 provisions
Cites 8: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Council Directive 89/665/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts; Dorsch Consult Ingenieurgesellschaft mbH v Bundesbaugesellschaft Berlin mbH (C-54/96); G. Vaassen-Göbbels (a widow) v Management of the Beambtenfonds voor het Mijnbedrijf (61/65); Pretore di Salò v Persons unknown (14/86); Municipality of Almelo and others v NV Energiebedrijf Ijsselmij (C-393/92); Handels- og Kontorfunktionærernes Forbund I Danmark v Dansk Arbejdsgiverforening, acting on behalf of Danfoss (109/88); Job Centre Coop. ARL (C-111/94)