23Secondly and in the alternative, the applicant claims that the Council was bound to interpret the provisions of the basic regulation in the light of Article 2, paragraph 2.2.2 of the WTO anti-dumping code, according to which the amounts corresponding to the profits established in the framework of the calculation of the constructed normal value may not exceed that ‘normally realised by other exporters or producers on sales of products of the same general category in the domestic market of the country of origin’. It considers that the amendments made to the GATT anti-dumping code during the course of the Uruguay Round of negotiations must be applied immediately to pending cases (Joined Cases 21/72 to 24/72 International Fruit Company and Others [1972] ECR 1219, paragraphs 14 to 18; Case 38/75Nederlandse Spoorwegen [1975] ECR 1439; and Case 112/80Dürbeck [1981] ECR 1095).