20In its third plea as to inadmissibility, the Commission submits that the letter of 26 April 1994 is not a challengeable decision and that, moreover, it is not clear from the form of order sought by the applicant that she seeks annulment of the implied decision rejecting her request of 7 February 1994 or of the decision of 26 April 1994. It has been consistently held, however, that only an act directly and immediately affecting the applicant's legal situation can be regarded as an act adversely affecting her (order of 7 June 1991 in Case T-14/91Weyrich v Commission [1991] ECR II-235, paragraph 35, and judgment in Case T-135/89Pfloeschner v Commission [1990] ECR II-153, paragraph 11). In the letter in question the Claims Office merely informed the applicant of the date on which her affiliation to the Common Scheme would come to an end. That effect arose directly out of Article 72(1 b) of the Staff Regulations, which provides that the cover of the ex-wife of an official is to terminate automatically one year after the divorce. There was therefore no need for the Claims Office to take a decision to that effect, and there is no act adversely affecting the applicant. Moreover, assuming that the letter of 26 April 1994 is an act open to challenge, the Commission questions whether the applicant complied with the three-month time-limit for submitting a complaint, since the complaint was registered on 9 August 1994.