17As regards the second head of the form of order sought concerning the exercise of its right of initiative vis-à-vis the Council, the Commission observes that it is for it alone to decide whether it is necessary to exercise that right (Case T-134/89Hettrich and Others v Commission [1990] ECR II-565, paragraph 22). That head of the form of order sought is therefore inadmissible. It is also inadmissible in so far as it presupposes that the Court will rule in the abstract on the legality of a provision of a general nature (Case T-110/89Pincherle v Commission [1991] ECR II-635, paragraph 30; Case T-41/90Barassi v Commission [1992] ECR II-159, paragraph 38, and Case T-42/90Bertelli v Commission [1992] ECR II-181, paragraph 38).