Judgment_paragraph 732 · Cimenteries CBR and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-25/95, T-26/95, T-30/95, T-31/95, T-32/95, T-34/95, T-35/95, T-36/95, T-37/95, T-38/95, T-39/95, T-42/95, T-43/95, T-44/95, T-45/95, T-46/95, T-48/95, T-50/95, T-51/95, T-52/95, T-53/95, T-54/95, T-55/95, T-56/95, T-57/95, T-58/95, T-59/95, T-60/95, T-61/95, T-62/95, T-63/95, T-64/95, T-65/95, T-68/95, T-69/95, T-70/95, T-71/95, T-87/95, T-88/95, T-103/95, T-104/95)

732The Court points out that the Commission may not compel an undertaking involved in a proceeding rinding an infringement of Article 85(1) and/or Article 86 of the Treaty ‘to provide answers which might involve an admission on its part of the existence of an infringement which it is incumbent on the Commission to prove’ (Case 374/87 Orkem v Commission [1989] ECR 3283, paragraph 35; Case T-34/93 Société Générale v Commission [1995] ECR II-545, paragraph 74; see, by analogy, the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Funke v France, Series A, No 256-A, p. 22).