91Contrary to the applicant's submission, the absence in the basic regulation of specific provisions on the legal consequences of a judgment annulling a measure cannot be interpreted as excluding any possibility for the institutions to resume both the investigation and the proceeding in the context of which the definitive measures annulled were adopted. Under Article 176 of the Treaty, it is for the institution concerned to draw the appropriate consequences of an annulling judgment. In those circumstances, the annulment of an act concluding an administrative proceeding which comprises several stages does not necessarily entail the annulment of the entire procedure prior to the adoption of the contested act regardless of the grounds, procedural or substantive, of the judgment pronouncing the annulment (see, to that effect, Asteris and Others, paragraph 30, and Case C-331/88 R v Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and Others, ex parte Fedesa and Others [1990] ECR I-4023, paragraph 34; Case T-38/89 Hochhaum v Commission [1990] ECR II-43, paragraph 13, and Joined Cases T-17/90, T-28/91 and T-17/92 Cámara Alloisio and Others v Commission [1993] ECR II-841, paragraph 79).
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.