Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Safety Hi-Tech Srl v S. & T. Srl (C-284/95)
Judgment
The first question
The legality of the prohibition on the…
36

Safety Hi-Tech Srl v S. & T. Srl (C-284/95)

law://eu/cjeu/1995/c-284-95/para_36@2026-11-13

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Full Court
Case: C-284/95 · ECLI:EU:C:1998:352
Decided: 14 Jul 1998
Procedure: Preliminary reference
Upheld as valid: Regulation 1994/3093
Applicant: Safety Hi-Tech Srl
Defendant: S. T. Sri
Rapporteur: K. M. Ioannou
Advocate General: P. Léger
Bench: 10 judges
C. Gulmann, H. Ragnemalm, M. Wathelet (Presidents of Chambers), G. F. Mancini, J. C. Moitinho de Almeida, P. J. G. Kapteyn, D. A. O. Edward, P. Jann, L. Sevón, K. M. Ioannou
Language: Italian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 61995CJ0284

Topics

Approximation of laws Dominant position Environment Measures having equivalent effect

Connections

Interprets 1: Council Regulation (EC) No 3093/94 of 15 December 1994 on substances that deplete the ozone layer
Cited by 19: ClientEarth AISBL v Council of the European Union (T-577/22); ClientEarth AISBL v Council of the European Union (T-648/22); European Investment Bank and European Commission v ClientEarth (C-212/21 P); ClientEarth v European Investment Bank (T-9/19); Mellifera eV, Vereinigung für wesensgemäße Bienenhaltung v European Commission (C-784/18); Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-128/17)3 provisions; Bayer CropScience AG and Others v European Commission (T-429/13, T-451/13); BASF Agro BV and Others v European Commission (T-584/13); Associazione Italia Nostra Onlus v Comune di Venezia and Others (C-444/15); TestBioTech eV and Others v European Commission (T-177/13); Du Pont de Nemours (France) SAS and Others v European Commission (T-31/07); Xeda International SA and Pace International LLC v European Commission (T-71/10); French Republic v European Commission (T-257/07)2 provisions; Dow AgroSciences Ltd and Others v European Commission (T-475/07)2 provisions; Arcelor SA v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (T-16/04); Société Arcelor Atlantique et Lorraine and Others v Premier ministre, Ministre de l’Écologie et du Développement durable and Ministre de l'Économie, des Finances et de l'Industrie (C-127/07); Hellenic Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-86/03)2 provisions; Radlberger Getränkegesellschaft mbH & Co. and S. Spitz KG v Land Baden-Württemberg (C-309/02); Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany (C-463/01)2 provisions
Cites 13: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; Telemarsicabruzzo SpA and Others v Circostel, Ministero delle Poste e Telecomunicazioni and Ministero della Difesa (C-320/90, C-321/90, C-322/90); 88/540/EEC: Council Decision of 14 October 1988 concerning the conclusion of the Vienna Convention for the protection of the ozone layer and the Montreal Protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer; Federal Republic of Germany v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-233/94); Meyhui NV v Schott Zwiesel Glaswerke AG (C-51/93); Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Denmark (302/86); Procureur de la République v Association de défense des brûleurs d'huiles usagées (ADBHU) (240/83); Criminal proceedings against Matteo Peralta (C-379/92); Criminal proceedings against Giorgio Domingo Banchero (C-157/92); Council Regulation (EC) No 3093/94 of 15 December 1994 on substances that deplete the ozone layer; 91/690/EEC: Council Decision of 12 December 1991 concerning the conclusion of the amendment to the Montreal Protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer as adopted in June 1990 in London by the Parties to the Protocol; 94/68/EC: Council Decision of 2 December 1993 concerning the conclusion of the amendment to the Montreal Protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer; Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany (C-61/94)

History · 1 version

14 Jul 1998Reading

Judgment of 14 Jul 1998

36That provision thus sets a series of objectives, principles and criteria which the Community legislature must respect in implementing environmental policy.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.