Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Francesco Benincasa v Dentalkit Srl (C-269/95)
Judgment
The third question
27

Francesco Benincasa v Dentalkit Srl (C-269/95)

Judgment of 3 Jul 1997law://eu/cjeu/1995/c-269-95/para_27@2026-11-12

27It is also consonant with that aim of legal certainty that the court seised should be able readily to decide whether it has jurisdiction on the basis of the rules of the Convention, without having to consider the substance of the case.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Sixth Chamber
Case: C-269/95 · ECLI:EU:C:1997:337
Decided: 3 Jul 1997
Procedure: Preliminary reference
Applicant: Francesco Benincasa
Defendant: Dentalkit Srl
Rapporteur: C. N. Kakouris
Advocate General: D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer
Bench: 4 judges
J. L. Murray, C. N. Kakouris, P. J. G. Kapteyn, H. Ragnemalm
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 61995CJ0269

Topics

History · 1 version

3 Jul 1997Reading

Connections

Cited by 16: Harald Kolassa v Barclays Bank plc (C-375/13)2 provisions; Cartel Damage Claims (CDC) Hydrogen Peroxide SA v Evonik Degussa GmbH and Others (C-352/13); Vorarlberger Gebietskrankenkasse v WGV-Schwäbische Allgemeine Versicherungs AG (C-347/08); Hőszig Kft. v Alstom Power Thermal Services (C-222/15); Johann Gruber v Bay Wa AG (C-464/01)2 provisions; Anica Milivojević v Raiffeisenbank St. Stefan-Jagerberg-Wolfsberg eGen (C-630/17)2 provisions; Maximilian Schrems v Facebook Ireland Limited (C-498/16); Maersk A/S v Allianz Seguros y Reaseguros SA and Mapfre España Compañía de Seguros y Reaseguros SA v MACS Maritime Carrier Shipping GmbH & Co (C-345/22)2 provisions; Česká spořitelna, a.s. v Gerald Feichter (C-419/11)2 provisions; Petra Engler v Janus Versand GmbH (C-27/02); Danmarks Rederiforening, acting on behalf of DFDS Torline A/S v LO Landsorganisationen i Sverige, acting on behalf of SEKO Sjöfolk Facket för Service och Kommunikation (C-18/02)2 provisions; AK v RU (C-197/24)2 provisions; AU v Reliantco Investments LTD and Reliantco Investments LTD Limassol Sucursala Bucureşti (C-500/18)2 provisions; KS and Others v Council of the European Union and Others (C-29/22 P)2 provisions; Les Chirurgiens-Dentistes de France and Others v Ministre des Solidarités et de la Santé and Others (C-940/19); Freistaat Bayern v Jan Blijdenstein (C-433/01)
Cites 9: Dumez France SA and Tracoba SARL v Hessische Landesbank and others (C-220/88); Powell Duffryn plc v Wolfgang Petereit (C-214/89); Shearson Lehmann Hutton Inc. v TVB Treuhandgesellschaft für Vermögensverwaltung und Beteiligungen mbH (C-89/91); Theodorus Engelbertus Sanders v Ronald van der Putte (73/77); Francesco Benincasa v Dentalkit Srl (C-269/95); Effer SpA v Hans-Joachim Kantner (38/81); Bertrand v Paul Ott KG (150/77); Mulox IBC Ltd v Hendrick Geels (C-125/92); Mainschiffahrts-Genossenschaft eG (MSG) v Les Gravières Rhénanes SARL (C-106/95)