Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
European Parliament v Angelo Innamorati (C-254/95 P)
Judgment
The plea concerning the scope and limi…
31

European Parliament v Angelo Innamorati (C-254/95 P)

Judgment of 4 Jul 1996law://eu/cjeu/1995/c-254-95/para_31@2026-11-11

31Having regard to the secrecy which must surround the proceedings of a selection board, communication of the marks obtained in the various tests constitutes an adequate statement of the reasons on which the board's decisions are based.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice
Case: C-254/95 P · ECLI:EU:C:1996:276
Decided: 4 Jul 1996
Procedure: staff cases unfounded
Ruled invalid: 61994TJ0289
Applicant: European Parliament
Defendant: Angelo Innamorati
Rapporteur: Puissochet
Advocate General: N. Fennelly
Bench: 2 judges
J. C. Moitinho de Almeida, C. Gulmann
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 61995CJ0254

Topics

Staff Regulations of Officials

History · 1 version

4 Jul 1996Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Angelo Innamorati v European Parliament (T-289/94)
Cited by 21: Isabel Sánchez v European Commission (T-229/24)2 provisions; HH v European Commission (T-23/25); LD v European Commission (T-1184/23); LA v European Commission (T-4/24); Alessandro Zardini v European Commission (T-9/24); TB v European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (T-560/21); WS v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-221/23); VT v European Commission (T-216/23); UJ and Others v European Commission (T-120/23); PF v European Parliament (T-317/22); Patrick Vanhoudt v European Investment Bank (T-490/21); LA v European Commission (T-456/20); Alessandro Zardini v European Commission (T-511/20); LD v European Commission (T-474/20); OI v European Commission (T-705/20); QF v European Commission (T-85/21); JP v European Commission (T-247/20); JR v European Commission (T-265/20)4 provisions; HC v European Commission (T-804/19); Vanesa Ruiz-Ruiz v European Commission (T-293/20); KV v European Commission (T-430/20)
Cites 10: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Bernard Michel v European Parliament (195/80); Antonio Marcato v European Commission (44/71); Francesco Bonu v Council of the European Union (89/79); Radio Telefis Eireann (RTE) and Independent Television Publications Ltd (ITP) v Commission of the European Communities (C-241/91 P, C-242/91 P); Antonio Marcato v European Commission (37/72); Maria Camera-Lampitelli and Others v European Commission (T-27/92); Angelo Innamorati v European Parliament (T-289/94); Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 of the Council of 29 February 1968 laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities and instituting special measures temporarily applicable to officials of the Commission (Staff Regulations of Officials); Mario Costacurta v European Commission (31/75)