22The defendant disputes that the cases to which the applicant alludes are comparable to his. The rectifications to the classification in step of Mr R and the official concerned in the Personnel Department took place following the interpretation of Article 32 of the Staff Regulations given by the Court in its judgments in Case 17/83Angelidis v Commission [1984] ECR 2907 and in Case 273/83Michel v Commission [1985] ECR 347, and cannot therefore be relied upon by the applicant since he is seeking reclassification following a legislative amendment. As far as the third case to which the applicant refers is concerned, the defendant states that that is a ‘highly exceptional case involving the application of Article 32 of the Staff Regulations a second time’ which falls outside the ambit of this dispute.