Judgment_paragraph 77 · J. C. Blom and Others v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities (T-87/94)

77In particular, the applicant claims that, in the defendants' conduct following the judgments of the Court of First Instance in Case T-20/94 Hartmann v Council and Commission [1997] ECR II-595 and Case T-554/93 Saint and Murray v Council and Commission [1997] ECR II-563, no distinction was drawn between the SLOM 1983 producers and the SLOM 1984 producers, with the result that nothing gave rise to the thought that they could in the end go back on the recognition of the Community's liability.

J. C. Blom and Others v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities (T-87/94)

Key facts

Connections

History · 1 version