Judgment_paragraph 59 · Koyo Seiko Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-166/94)

59As regards price differences, the applicant does not accept that the part of the Community market adopted was a representative sample (point 63 of the application) but it adduces no evidence to show that the prices charged in Italy and in Spain by French, German and United Kingdom producers differ from those charged by those same producers in France, Germany or in the United Kingdom. The applicant has therefore not shown that the Community institutions committed a manifest error in limiting their investigation of the injury suffered by the Community industry to price differences in France, Germany and the United Kingdom (point 33 of the provisional regulation).

Koyo Seiko Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-166/94)

Key facts

Connections

History · 1 version