Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Ferchimex SA v Council of the European Union (T-164/94)
Judgment
Procedure
25

Ferchimex SA v Council of the European Union (T-164/94)

law://eu/cjeu/1994/t-164-94/para_25@2026-11-15

Key facts

Court: General Court · Fourth Chamber, sitting with five Judges
Case: T-164/94 · ECLI:EU:T:1995:173
Decided: 28 Sept 1995
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Ferchimex SA
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Rapporteur: Schintgen
Bench: 4 judges
R. Schintgen, C. P. Briët, R. García-Valdecasas, P. Lindh
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 61994TJ0164

Topics

History · 1 version

28 Sept 1995Reading

Connections

Cited by 17: Vyatsky Plywood Mill OOO v European Commission (T-32/22); Hüpeden & Co. (GmbH & Co.) KG v Council of the European Union and European Commission (T-206/14); I. Schroeder KG (GmbH & Co.) v Council of the European Union and European Commission (T-205/14)2 provisions; Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-310/12); Gold East Paper (Jiangsu) Co. Ltd and Gold Huasheng Paper (Suzhou Industrial Park) Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-443/11)2 provisions; Gold East Paper (Jiangsu) Co. Ltd and Gold Huasheng Paper (Suzhou Industrial Park) Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-444/11)2 provisions; Hangzhou Duralamp Electronics Co., Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-459/07); Philips Lighting Poland S.A. and Philips Lighting BV v Council of the European Union (T-469/07)2 provisions; EuroChem Mineral and Chemical Company OAO (EuroChem MCC) v Council of the European Union (T-84/07)2 provisions; Acron OAO and Dorogobuzh OAO v Council of the European Union (T-235/08); EuroChem Mineral and Chemical Company OAO (EuroChem MCC) v Council of the European Union (T-459/08); Acron OAO v Council of the European Union (T-118/10); Since Hardware (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-156/11)2 provisions; Chelyabinsk electrometallurgical integrated plant OAO (CHEMK) and Kuzneckie ferrosplavy OAO (KF) v Council of the European Union (T-190/08)2 provisions; Interpipe Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant Niko Tube ZAT (Interpipe Niko Tube ZAT) and Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant VAT (Interpipe NTRP VAT) v Council of the European Union (T-249/06); HEG Ltd and Graphite India Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-462/04); Aluminium Silicon Mill Products GmbH v Council of the European Union (T-107/04)2 provisions
Cites 17: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Extramet Industrie SA v Council of the European Communities (C-358/89); 88/591/ECSC, EEC, Euratom: Council Decision of 24 October 1988 establishing a Court of First Instance of the European Communities; Nicolet Instrument GmbH v Hauptzollamt Frankfurt am Main - Flughafen (203/85); Council Regulation (EEC) No 2423/88 of 11 July 1988 on protection against dumped or subsidized imports from countries not members of the European Economic Community; Detlef Nölle, trading as "Eugen Nölle" v Hauptzollamt Bremen-Freihafen (C-16/90); Nachi Fujikoshi Corporation v Council of the European Communities (255/84); Gestetner Holdings plc v Council and Commission of the European Communities (C-156/87); Neotype Techmashexport GmbH v Commission and Council of the European Communities (C-305/86, C-160/87); Continentale Produkten-Gesellschaft Erhardt-Renken GmbH & Co. v Hauptzollamt München-West (246/87); Council Regulation (EEC) No 3068/92 of 23 October 1992 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of potassium chloride originating in Belarus, Russia or Ukraine; Gao Yao (Hong-Kong) Hua Fa Industrial Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (C-75/92); 93/350/ECSC, EEC, Euratom: Council Decision of 8 June 1993 amending Council Decision 88/591/ECSC, EEC, Euratom establishing a Court of First Instance of the European Communities; Enital SpA v Commission and Council of the European Communities (C-304/86); 94/149/ECSC, EC: Council Decision of 7 March 1994 amending Decision 93/350/Euratom, ECSC, EEC amending Decision 88/591/ECSC, EEC, Euratom establishing a Court of First Instance of the European Communities; Council Regulation (EEC) No 2442/92 of 4 August 1992 extending the provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of potassium chloride originating in Belarus, Russia and Ukraine; Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1031/92 of 23 April 1992 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of potassium chloride (potash) originating in Belarus, Russia or Ukraine

Judgment of 28 Sept 1995

25By order of 18 April 1994 the Court of Justice referred the case to the Court of First Instance pursuant to Article 4 of Council Decision 93/350/Euratom, ECSC, EEC of 8 June 1993 amending Decision 88/591/ECSC, EEC, Euratom establishing a Court of First Instance of the European Communities (OJ 1993 L 144, p. 21) and Council Decision 94/149/ECSC, EC of 7 March 1994 amending Decision 93/350/Euratom, ECSC, EEC (OJ 1994 L 66, p. 29).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.