Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Ajinomoto Co. Inc. and The NutraSweet Company v Council of the European Union (T-159/94, T-160/94)
Judgment
Substance
II —Pleas common to the two cases
The pleas alleging infringement of ess…
B —Findings of the Court
4.The alleged insufficiency, in the li…
(a)The criteria to be fulfilled by req…
93

Ajinomoto Co. Inc. and The NutraSweet Company v Council of the European Union (T-159/94, T-160/94)

Judgment of 18 Dec 1997law://eu/cjeu/1994/t-159-94/para_93@2026-11-11

93The sufficiency of the information provided by the Community institutions must be assessed in relation to how specific the request for information was.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Fifth Chamber, sitting with five Judges
Cases: T-159/94, T-160/94 · ECLI:EU:T:1997:209
Decided: 18 Dec 1997
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicants: Ajinomoto Co., Inc.; The NutraSweet Company
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Rapporteur: Azizi
Bench: 4 judges
V. Tiili, J. Azizi, R. M. Moura Ramos, M. Jaeger
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 61994TJ0159

Topics

History · 1 version

18 Dec 1997Reading

Connections

Cited by 16: Kingdom of Cambodia and Cambodia Rice Federation (CRF) v European Commission (T-246/19)2 provisions; Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-541/18); Zhejiang Jiuli Hi-Tech Metals Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-307/18); Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-442/12)2 provisions; Jinan Meide Casting Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-424/13)2 provisions; Hangzhou Duralamp Electronics Co., Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-459/07); Alumina d.o.o. v Council of the European Union (T-304/11)2 provisions; EuroChem Mineral and Chemical Company OAO (EuroChem MCC) v Council of the European Union (T-84/07)2 provisions; Acron OAO and Dorogobuzh OAO v Council of the European Union (T-235/08); EuroChem Mineral and Chemical Company OAO (EuroChem MCC) v Council of the European Union (T-459/08); HEG Ltd and Graphite India Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-462/04); Ritek Corp. and Prodisc Technology Inc. v Council of the European Union (T-274/02)2 provisions; Fédération des industries condimentaires de France (FICF) and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-317/02)2 provisions; Shanghai Teraoka Electronic Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-35/01)2 provisions; Kundan Industries Ltd and Tata International Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-88/98); Ajinomoto Co., Inc. and The NutraSweet Company v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities (C-76/98 P, C-77/98 P)2 provisions
Cites 17: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Nicolet Instrument GmbH v Hauptzollamt Frankfurt am Main - Flughafen (203/85); Ferchimex SA v Council of the European Union (T-164/94); Al-Jubail Fertilizer Company (Samad) and Saudi Arabian Fertilizer Company (Safco) v Council of the European Communities (C-49/88); Brother Industries Ltd v Council of the European Communities (250/85); Council Regulation (EEC) No 2423/88 of 11 July 1988 on protection against dumped or subsidized imports from countries not members of the European Economic Community; Timex Corporation v Council and Commission of the European Communities (264/82); Detlef Nölle, trading as "Eugen Nölle" v Hauptzollamt Bremen-Freihafen (C-16/90); Nachi Fujikoshi Corporation v Council of the European Communities (255/84); Neotype Techmashexport GmbH v Commission and Council of the European Communities (C-305/86, C-160/87); NTN Toyo Bearing Company Limited and others v Council of the European Communities (240/84); Technointorg v Commission and Council of the European Communities (294/86, 77/87); Brother Industries Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (56/85); Council Regulation (EEC) No 1391/91 of 27 May 1991 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of aspartame originating in Japan and the United States of America; Miwon Co. Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (T-208/95); Canon Inc. and others v Council of the European Communities (277/85, 300/85); Nakajima All Precision Co. Ltd v Council of the European Communities (C-69/89)