Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Reinhard Gebhard v Consiglio dell'Ordine degli Avvocati e Procuratori di Milano (C-55/94)
Judgment
26

Reinhard Gebhard v Consiglio dell'Ordine degli Avvocati e Procuratori di Milano (C-55/94)

Judgment of 30 Nov 1995law://eu/cjeu/1994/c-55-94/para_26@2026-11-11

26In contrast, where the provider of services moves to another Member State, the provisions of the chapter on services, in particular the third paragraph of Article 60, envisage that he is to pursue his activity there on a temporary basis.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Full Court
Case: C-55/94 · ECLI:EU:C:1995:411
Decided: 30 Nov 1995
Procedure: Preliminary reference
Applicant: Reinhard Gebhard
Defendant: Consiglio dell'Ordine degli Avvocati e Procuratori di Milano
Rapporteur: D. A. O. Edward
Advocate General: P. Léger
Bench: 12 judges
C. N. Kakouris, D. A. O. Edward, G. Hirsch (Presidents of Chambers), G. F. Mancini, F. Α. Schockweiler, J. C. Moitinho de Almeida, P. J. G. Kapteyn, C. Gulmann, J. L. Murray, P. Jann, H. Ragnemalm, L. Sevón
Language: Italian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 61994CJ0055

Topics

Freedom of establishment Freedom to provide services

History · 1 version

30 Nov 1995Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)
Cited by 20: European Commission v Hungary (C-179/14); Eleftherios-Themistoklis Nasiopoulos v Ipourgos Igias kai Pronias (C-575/11)2 provisions; Angelo Alberto Torresi and Pierfrancesco Torresi v Consiglio dell’Ordine degli Avvocati di Macerata (C-58/13, C-59/13); Vorarlberger Landes- und Hypothekenbank AG v Finanzamt Feldkirch (C-625/17)2 provisions; Slagelse Almennyttige Boligselskab Afdeling Schackenborgvænge and Others v MV and Others (C-417/23); European Commission v Kingdom of Denmark (C-482/23); European Commission v Portuguese Republic (C-768/22); Società Italiana Imprese Balneari Srl v Comune di Rosignano Marittimo and Others (C-598/22); FK v Rechtsanwaltskammer Wien (C-58/21); TP v Institut des Experts en Automobiles (C-502/20); Caisse de retraite du personnel navigant professionnel de l'aéronautique civile (CRPNPAC) v Vueling Airlines SA v Vueling Airlines SA and Jean-Luc Poignant (C-370/17, C-37/18); AV and BU v Comune di Bernareggio (C-465/18); Trustees of the P Panayi Accumulation & Maintenance Settlements v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (C-646/15); Paul Rosenich v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-527/14); Medisanus d.o.o. v Splošna Bolnišnica Murska Sobota (C-296/15); Leopoldine Gertraud Piringer (C-342/15); Valsts ieņēmumu dienests v Ablessio SIA (C-527/11)2 provisions; SIA Garkalns v Rīgas dome (C-470/11); Duomo Gpa Srl and Others v Comune di Baranzate and Comune di Venegono Inferiore (C-357/10, C-358/10, C-359/10)2 provisions; Donat Cornelius Ebert v Budapesti Ügyvédi Kamara (C-359/09)2 provisions
Cites 10: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)5 provisions; Council Directive 77/249/EEC of 22 March 1977 to facilitate the effective exercise by lawyers of freedom to provide services; Council Directive 89/48/EEC of 21 December 1988 on a general system for the recognition of higher-education diplomas awarded on completion of professional education and training of at least three years' duration; Dieter Kraus v Land Baden-Württemberg (C-19/92); Irène Vlassopoulou v Ministerium für Justiz, Bundes- und Europaangelegenheiten Baden-Württemberg (C-340/89); Ordre des avocats au Barreau de Paris v Onno Klopp (107/83); Jean Thieffry v Conseil de l'ordre des avocats à la cour de Paris (71/76); Groupement National des Négociants en Pommes de Terre de Belgique v ITM Belgium SA and Vocarex SA (C-63/94); Reinhard Gebhard v Consiglio dell'Ordine degli Avvocati e Procuratori di Milano (C-55/94); Jean Reyners v Belgian State (2/74)