Judgment_paragraph 44 · Cobrecaf SA, Pêche & Froid SA and Klipper investissements SARL v Commission of the European Communities (T-514/93)

44It is settled law that, where an applicant lets the time-limit for bringing an action against a decision unequivocally laying down a measure with legal effects affecting his interests and binding on him expire, he cannot start time running again by asking the institution to reconsider its decision and bringing an action against the refusal confirming the decision previously taken (see the judgments of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases 166/86 and 220/86 Irish Cement v Commission [1988] ECR 6473, paragraph 16, and Case C-199/91 Foyer Culturel du Sart-Tilman v Commission [1993] ECR I-2667, paragraphs 23 and 24).

Cobrecaf SA, Pêche & Froid SA and Klipper investissements SARL v Commission of the European Communities (T-514/93)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections