Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Bestuur van het Algemeen Burgerlijk Pensioenfonds v G. A. Beune (C-7/93)
Judgment
The first and fifth questions
38

Bestuur van het Algemeen Burgerlijk Pensioenfonds v G. A. Beune (C-7/93)

Judgment of 28 Sept 1994law://eu/cjeu/1993/c-7-93/para_38@2026-11-11

38Nor does the criterion relating to the arrangements for funding and managing a pension scheme such as the one established by the ABPW make it possible to decide whether the scheme falls within the scope of Article 119.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Full Court
Case: C-7/93 · ECLI:EU:C:1994:350
Decided: 28 Sept 1994
Procedure: Preliminary reference
Applicant: Bestuur van het Algemeen Burgerlijk Pensioenfonds
Defendant: G. A. Beune
Rapporteur: F. Grévisse
Advocate General: F. G. Jacobs
Bench: 8 judges
J. C. Moitinho de Almeida, D. A. O. Edward (Presidents of Chambers), C. N. Kakouris, R. Joliet, G. C. Rodríguez Iglesias, F. Grévisse, M. Zuleeg, P. J. G. Kapteyn
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 61993CJ0007

Topics

Social policy Social security

History · 1 version

28 Sept 1994Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions
Cited by 16: E.B. v Versicherungsanstalt öffentlich Bediensteter BVA (C-258/17); WA v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) (C-450/18); European Commission v Republic of Poland (C-192/18)2 provisions; David L. Parris v Trinity College Dublin and Others (C-443/15)2 provisions; Carlos Andres and Others v European Central Bank (T-129/14); Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Karen Dittrich and Robert Klinke and Jörg-Detlef Müller v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-124/11, C-125/11, C-143/11)2 provisions; Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic (C-559/07); Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (C-46/07); Tadao Maruko v Versorgungsanstalt der deutschen Bühnen (C-267/06); Viktor Hlozek v Roche Austria Gesellschaft mbH (C-19/02)2 provisions; Debra Allonby v Accrington & Rossendale College, Education Lecturing Services, trading as Protocol Professional and Secretary of State for Education and Employment (C-256/01)2 provisions; Hilde Schönheit v Stadt Frankfurt am Main and Silvia Becker v Land Hessen (C-4/02, C-5/02)2 provisions; Pirkko Niemi (C-351/00)2 provisions; Joseph Griesmar v Ministre de l'Economie, des Finances et de l'Industrie and Ministre de la Fonction publique, de la Réforme de l'Etat et de la Décentralisation (C-366/99)2 provisions; Jean-Marie Podesta v Caisse de retraite par répartition des ingénieurs cadres & assimilés (CRICA) and Others (C-50/99)2 provisions; Deutsche Post AG v Elisabeth Sievers and Brunhilde Schrage (C-270/97, C-271/97)
Cites 14: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Helga Nimz v Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg (C-184/89); Douglas Harvey Barber v Guardian Royal Exchange Assurance Group (C-262/88); Gerardus Cornelis Ten Oever v Stichting Bedrijfspensioenfonds voor het Glazenwassers- en Schoonmaakbedrijf (C-109/91); Council Directive 86/378/EEC of 24 July 1986 on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in occupational social security schemes; Maria Kowalska v Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg (C-33/89); Bilka - Kaufhaus GmbH v Karin Weber von Hartz (170/84); Gabrielle Defrenne v Belgian State (80/70); A. Verholen and others v Sociale Verzekeringsbank Amsterdam (C-87/90, C-88/90, C-89/90); Michael Moroni v Collo GmbH (C-110/91); Remi van Cant v Rijksdienst voor pensioenen (C-154/92); Bestuur van het Algemeen Burgerlijk Pensioenfonds v G. A. Beune (C-7/93); Gabrielle Defrenne v Société anonyme belge de navigation aérienne Sabena (43/75); Council Directive 79/7/EEC of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security