Judgment_paragraph 13 · R. Moscato v Bestuur van de Nieuwe Algemene Bedrijfsvereniging (C-481/93)

13Mr Moscato appealed against the NAB's refusal to the Arrondissementsrechtbank, Amsterdam, which took the view that the dispute raised issues concerning the interpretation of Article 13(2)(a) and Article 39(1) and (5) of Regulation No 1408/71, particularly in view of a number of judgments given by the Court of Justice concerning the determination of the legislation applicable pursuant to the provisions of Title II of Regulation No 1408/71. The judgments in question were given in Case 302/84 Ten Holder v Nieuwe Algemene Bedrijfsvereniging [1986] ECR 1821, Case C-140/88 Noij v Staatssecretaris van Finandën [1991] ECR 1-387, Case C-245/88 Daalmeijer v Bestuur van de Sociale Verzekeringsbank [1991] ECR 1-555 and Case 58/87 Rebmann v Bundesversicherungsanstalt für Angestellte [1988] ECR 3467.

R. Moscato v Bestuur van de Nieuwe Algemene Bedrijfsvereniging (C-481/93)

Key facts

Connections

History · 1 version