Judgment_paragraph 76 · Groupement d'achat Édouard Leclerc v Commission of the European Communities (T-88/92)

76The statement of reasons in the Decision is clear and complete, in particular in Paragraph II. A.5. Furthermore, it is clear from the judgments in L'Oréal, cited above, and in Case 99/79 Lancôme v Etos [1980] ECR 2511, and from Commission Decision 85/616/EEC of 16 December 1985 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 85 of the EEC Treaty (IV/30.665 — Villeroy & Boch) (OJ 1985 L 376, p. 15), that there was nothing novel in considering that preservation of the prestige image of a product may justify criteria relating to a retailer's professional qualifications and to the quality of his premises.

Groupement d'achat Édouard Leclerc v Commission of the European Communities (T-88/92)

Key facts

Connections

History · 1 version