24In Case T-57/92 the applicant claims that the Court should:(1) declare the application admissible and well founded;(2) consequently, annul the appointing authority's decision of 10 December 1991 and, so far as necessary, the implied decision rejecting the applicant's complaint of 15 January 1992, and grant the applicant the right to payment of the resettlement allowance together with default interest at the rate of 8% from 7 October 1991, and also exempt him from any repayment of the installation allowance granted to him;(3) in any event, order the defendant to pay all the costs, as provided in Articles 90 and 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance.In Case C-75/92 the applicant claims that the Court should:(1) declare the application admissible and well founded;(2) annul the appointing authority's decision of 10 December 1991 and, so far as necessary, the implied decision rejecting his complaint of 24 February 1992, and grant the applicant the right to payment of the resettlement allowance equal to two months' salary, together with default interest at the rate of 8% from 7 October 1991;(3) in any event, order the defendant to pay all the costs, as provided in Articles 90 and 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance.