71It follows that, contrary to the principles applied by the Court of Justice in its judgments in Metro I, Metro II, and L'Oréal, cited above, and in Case 99/79 Lancôme v Etos [1980] ECR 2511, the selective distribution system at issue excludes new forms of trading by the use of criteria which are not objective, uniform, applied in a nondiscriminatory fashion or proportionate to what is necessary. Moreover, the criteria set out in the Decision have eliminated a ‘particular form of trading’, contrary to the case-law of the Court of Justice in Metro I (paragraphs 20 and 50), Metro II (paragraph 34) and AEG (paragraphs 36 and 73).
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.