Judgment_paragraph 13 · European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-388/92)

13As the Parliament maintains, a comparison between the Commission's initial proposal and the contested regulation shows that, as far as regular services are concerned, the amendments made have restricted the scope of the regulation to certain types of road passenger transport and to certain restricted frontier zones in such a way as to affect the very essence of the enactment. Those amendments must therefore be regarded as substantial.

European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-388/92)

Key facts

Connections

History · 1 version