Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Samenwerkende Elektriciteits-Produktiebedrijven (SEP) NV v Commission of the European Communities (C-36/92 P)
Judgment
The first five grounds of appeal
21

Samenwerkende Elektriciteits-Produktiebedrijven (SEP) NV v Commission of the European Communities (C-36/92 P)

Judgment of 19 May 1994law://eu/cjeu/1992/c-36-92/para_21@2026-11-11

21For the reasons stated in paragraphs 21 to 42 of the Advocate General's Opinion, the first, second, third, fourth and fifth grounds of appeal must be rejected as unfounded.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fifth Chamber
Case: C-36/92 P · ECLI:EU:C:1994:205
Decided: 19 May 1994
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Samenwerkende Elektriciteits-produktiebedrijven NV
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Rapporteur: G. C. Rodriguez Iglesias
Advocate General: F. G. Jacobs
Bench: 4 judges
R. Joliét, G. C. Rodriguez Iglesias, F. Grévisse, M. Zuleeg
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 61992CJ0036

Topics

Agreements, decisions and concerted practices

History · 1 version

19 May 1994Reading

Connections

Cited by 17: Varec SA v Belgian State (C-450/06); Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV (LVM), DSM NV and DSM Kunststoffen BV, Montedison SpA, Elf Atochem SA, Degussa AG, Enichem SpA, Wacker-Chemie GmbH and Hoechst AG and Imperial Chemical Industries plc (ICI) v Commission of the European Communities (C-238/99 P, C-244/99 P, C-245/99 P, C-247/99 P, C-250/99 P, C-251/99 P, C-252/99 P, C-254/99 P)2 provisions; Qualcomm, Inc. and Qualcomm Europe, Inc. v European Commission (C-466/19 P)2 provisions; Deza, a.s. v European Chemicals Agency (T-189/14); HeidelbergCement AG v European Commission (C-247/14 P)3 provisions; Buzzi Unicem SpA v European Commission (C-267/14); Italmobiliare SpA v European Commission (C-268/14); Schwenk Zement KG v European Commission (C-248/14); Schenker AG v European Commission (T-534/11)2 provisions; (publication by extracts) Intel Corp. v European Commission (T-286/09); Buzzi Unicem SpA v European Commission (T-297/11); Schwenk Zement KG v European Commission (T-306/11); Deutsche Post AG v European Commission (T-570/08); Slovak Telekom a.s. v European Commission (T-458/09, T-171/10)2 provisions; Postbank NV v Commission of the European Communities (T-353/94)2 provisions; Imperial Chemical Industries plc v Commission of the European Communities (T-36/91)2 provisions; Solvay SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-30/91)
Cites 8: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; EEC Council: Regulation No 17: First Regulation implementing Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty; Jean Lestelle v European Commission (C-30/91 P); AKZO Chemie BV and AKZO Chemie UK Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (53/85); NV Samenwerkende Elektriciteits-Produktiebedrijven v Commission of the European Communities (T-39/90); Dirección General de Defensa de la Competencia v Asociación Española de Banca Privada and others (C-67/91); Samenwerkende Elektriciteits-produktiebedrijven NV v Commission of the European Communities (T-39/90); Samenwerkende Elektriciteits-Produktiebedrijven NV v Commission of the European Communities (C-372/90)