Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Finanzamt Uelzen v Dieter Armbrecht (C-291/92)
Judgment
The first question
24

Finanzamt Uelzen v Dieter Armbrecht (C-291/92)

Judgment of 4 Oct 1995law://eu/cjeu/1992/c-291-92/para_24@2026-11-12

24The answer to the first question must therefore be that, where a taxable person sells property part of which he had chosen to reserve for his private use, he does not act with respect to the sale of that part as a taxable person within the meaning of Article 2(1) of the Directive.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Full Court
Case: C-291/92 · ECLI:EU:C:1995:304
Decided: 4 Oct 1995
Procedure: Preliminary reference
Applicant: Finanzamt Uelzen
Defendant: Dieter Armbrecht
Rapporteur: Murray
Advocate General: F. G. Jacobs
Bench: 5 judges
F. A. Schockweiler, P. J. G. Kapteyn, C. Gulmann, P. Jann (Presidents of Chambers), G. F. Mancini
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 61992CJ0291

Topics

Value added tax

History · 1 version

4 Oct 1995Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes - Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment
Cited by 14: Eon Aset Menidjmunt OOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane I upravlenie na izpalnenieto’ — Varna pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite (C-118/11)2 provisions; Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej v J.S (C-182/23); Suzlon Wind Energy Portugal - Energia Eólica Unipessoal, Lda v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (C-605/20); Szef Krajowej Administracji Skarbowej v Polfarmex Spółka Akcyjna w Kutnie (C-421/17); Petar Kezić s.p. Trgovina Prizma v Republika Slovenija (C-331/14)2 provisions; État belge v Medicom SPRL (C‑210/11) and Maison Patrice Alard SPRL (C‑211/11) (C-210/11, C-211/11)2 provisions; Klub OOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i upravlenie na izpalnenieto’ — Varna pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite (C-153/11)2 provisions; Belgian State v Nathalie De Fruytier (C-237/09)2 provisions; Aktiebolaget NN v Skatteverket (C-111/05)2 provisions; Uudenkaupungin kaupunki (C-184/04)2 provisions; Optigen Ltd, Fulcrum Electronics Ltd and Bond House Systems Ltd v Commissioners of Customs & Excise (C-354/03, C-355/03, C-484/03)2 provisions; Centralan Property Ltd v Commissioners of Customs & Excise (C-63/04)2 provisions; P. Charles and T. S. Charles-Tijmens v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (C-434/03)2 provisions; Finanzamt Bergisch Gladbach v HE (C-25/03)2 provisions
Cites 4: Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes - Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment; Hansgeorg Lennartz v Finanzamt München III (C-97/90); Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Shipping and Forwarding Enterprise Safe BV (C-320/88); Finanzamt Uelzen v Dieter Armbrecht (C-291/92)