Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Hüls AG v Commission of the European Communities (C-199/92 P)
Judgment
Pleas in law in support of the appeal:…
Infringements of Community law committ…
Participation in regular meetings
161

Hüls AG v Commission of the European Communities (C-199/92 P)

Judgment of 8 Jul 1999law://eu/cjeu/1992/c-199-92/para_161@2026-11-12

161It follows, first, that the concept of a concerted practice, as it results from the actual terms of Article 81(1) EC, implies, besides undertakings' concerting with each other, subsequent conduct on the market, and a relationship of cause and effect between the two.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Sixth Chamber
Case: C-199/92 P · ECLI:EU:C:1999:358
Decided: 8 Jul 1999
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Hüls AG
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Rapporteur: G.F. Mancini
Advocate General: G. Cosmas
Bench: 4 judges
G. Hirsch, G.F. Mancini, J.L. Murray, H. Ragnemalm
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 61992CJ0199

Topics

Agreements, decisions and concerted practices

History · 1 version

8 Jul 1999Reading

Connections

Cited by 20: Banco BPN/BIC Português SA and Others v Autoridade da Concorrência (C-298/22)2 provisions; Universität Koblenz-Landau v European Education and Culture Executive Agency (C-288/21); Singapore Airlines Ltd and Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd v European Commission (T-350/17); Pometon SpA v European Commission (C-440/19 P); Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corp. and Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea Corp. v European Commission (T-8/16); Deutsche Lufthansa AG v European Commission (T-492/15); Pometon SpA v European Commission (T-433/16); Niche Generics Ltd v European Commission (T-701/14); Unichem Laboratories Ltd v European Commission (T-705/14); Teva UK Ltd and Others v European Commission (T-679/14); Stührk Delikatessen Import GmbH & Co. KG v European Commission (T-58/14); Daniele Possanzini v European Border and Coast Guard Agency (T-686/16); Timab Industries and Cie financière et de participations Roullier (CFPR) v European Commission (C-411/15 P); Telefónica, SA v European Commission (T-216/13)2 provisions; Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías, SA and Others v European Commission (T-426/10); Kühne + Nagel International AG and Others v European Commission (T-254/12); UTi Worldwide, Inc. and Others v European Commission (T-264/12); Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH and Others v European Commission (T-393/10)2 provisions; Fapricela - Indústria de Trefilaria, SA v European Commission (T-398/10)2 provisions; FSL Holdings and Others v European Commission (T-655/11)2 provisions
Cites 18: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Union royale belge des sociétés de football association ASBL v Jean-Marc Bosman, Royal club liégeois SA v Jean-Marc Bosman and others and Union des associations européennes de football (UEFA) v Jean-Marc Bosman (C-415/93); A. Ahlström Osakeyhtiö and others v Commission of the European Communities (89/85, 104/85, 114/85, 116/85, 117/85, 125/85, 126/85, 127/85, 128/85, 129/85); Commission of the European Communities v BASF AG, Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV, DSM NV, DSM Kunststoffen BV, Hüls AG, Elf Atochem SA, Société Artésienne de Vinyle SA, Wacker Chemie GmbH, Enichem SpA, Hoechst AG, Imperial Chemical Industries plc, Shell International Chemical Company Ltd and Montedison SpA (C-137/92 P); Raimund Vidrányi v European Commission (C-283/90 P); SA Roquette Frères v Council of the European Communities (138/79); Coöperatieve Vereniging "Suiker Unie" UA and others v Commission of the European Communities (C-40/73, C-41/73, C-42/73, C-43/73, C-44/73, C-45/73, C-46/73, C-47/73, C-48/73, C-50/73, C-54/73, C-55/73, C-56/73, C-111/73, C-113/73, C-114/73); San Marco Impex Italiana Srl v Commission of the European Communities (C-19/95); Commission Decision of 23 April 1986 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty (IV/31.149 - Polypropylene) (Only the German, English, French, Italian and Dutch texts are authentic); Hilti AG v Commission of the European Communities (C-53/92 P); BASF AG and others v Commission of the European Communities (T-79/89, T-84/89, T-85/89, T-86/89, T-89/89, T-91/89, T-92/89, T-96/89, T-98/89, T-102/89, T-104/89); Hüls AG v Commission of the European Communities (T-9/89); Maurice Prelle v European Commission (77/70); European Commission v Augusto Brazzelli Lualdi (C-136/92 P); Gerhard Züchner v Bayerische Vereinsbank AG (172/80); Baustahlgewebe GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-185/95 P); John Deere Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-7/95 P); New Holland Ford Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-8/95 P)