Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

European Union
Matra SA v Commission of the European Communities (C-225/91)
Judgment
Substance
The plea alleging breach of procedural…
44

Matra SA v Commission of the European Communities (C-225/91)

law://eu/cjeu/1991/c-225-91/para_44@2026-11-15

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

History · 1 version

15 Jun 1993Reading

44Nevertheless, the procedure under Article 85 et seq. and that under Article 92 et seq. of the Treaty are independent procedures governed by specific rules.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Full Court
Case: C-225/91 · ECLI:EU:C:1993:239
Decided: 15 Jun 1993
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Matra SA, a company incorporated under French law, whose registered office is in Paris, represented by Mario Siragusa, of the Rome Bar, and Antoine Winckler, of the Paris Bar, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the Chambers of Arendt and Medernach, 8-10 Rue Mathias Hardt
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Rapporteur: Schockweiler
Advocate General: W. Van Gerven
Bench: 8 judges
M. Zuleeg, J. L. Murray (Presidents of Chambers), G. F. Mancini, F. A. Schockweiler, J. C. Moitinho de Almeida, F. Grévisse, M. Diez de Velasco, P. J. G. Kapteyn
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 61991CJ0225

Topics

Judgment of 15 Jun 1993

Connections

Cited by 22: European Commission v Tempus Energy Ltd and Tempus Energy Technology Ltd (C-57/19 P); Republic of Austria v European Commission (C-59/23 P)2 provisions; UBS Group AG and Others v European Commission (T-441/21); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (T-268/21); European Commission v Anthony Braesch and Others (C-284/21 P); Republic of Austria v European Commission (T-101/18)3 provisions; Tirreno Power SpA v European Commission (T-793/19); Set SpA v European Commission (T-794/19); Petra Flašker v European Commission (T-392/20); Tempus Energy Germany GmbH and T Energy Sweden AB v European Commission (T-167/19); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (T-665/20); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (T-643/20); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (T-465/20); Verband Deutscher Alten- und Behindertenhilfe, Landesverband Niedersachsen/Bremen und Hamburg/Schleswig-Holstein eV and CarePool Hannover GmbH v European Commission (T-69/18); European Commission v Gmina Miasto Gdynia and Port Lotniczy Gdynia Kosakowo sp. z o.o (C-56/18 P); FVE Holýšov I s. r. o. and Others v European Commission (T-217/17); NeXovation, Inc. v European Commission (T-353/15); Ja zum Nürburgring eV v European Commission (T-373/15); Vereniging Gelijkberechtiging Grondbezitters and Others v European Commission (T-79/16); Søndagsavisen A/S v European Commission (T-167/14); Magic Mountain Kletterhallen GmbH and Others v European Commission (T-162/13); Secop GmbH v European Commission (T-79/14)
Cites 11: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)6 provisions; Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (73/79); Matra SA v Commission of the European Communities (C-225/91); Plaumann & Co. v Commission of the European Economic Community (25/62); Comité International de la Rayonne et des Fibres Synthétiques and others v Commission of the European Communities (C-313/90); Iannelli & Volpi SpA v Ditta Paolo Meroni (74/76); SA Intermills v Commission of the European Communities (323/82); Regulation 1962/17; William Cook plc v Commission of the European Communities (C-198/91); Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-303/88); Neotype Techmashexport GmbH v Commission and Council of the European Communities (C-305/86, C-160/87)