Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

European Union
Doris Knoch v Bundesanstalt für Arbeit (C-102/91)
Judgment
The third question
53

Doris Knoch v Bundesanstalt für Arbeit (C-102/91)

law://eu/cjeu/1991/c-102-91/para_53@2026-11-15

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fourth Chamber
Case: C-102/91 · ECLI:EU:C:1992:303
Decided: 8 Jul 1992
Procedure: Preliminary reference
Applicant: Doris Knoch
Defendant: Bundesanstalt für Arbeit
Rapporteur: Kapteyn
Advocate General: W. Van Gerven
Bench: 2 judges
M. Diez de Velasco, J. L. Murray
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 61991CJ0102

Topics

Social security

History · 1 version

8 Jul 1992Reading

Judgment of 8 Jul 1992

53Consequently, the competent institution of the Member State where the person concerned resides or, in legal proceedings, the national court remains entirely free to verify the content of that statement.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Connections

Interprets 2: Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71; Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 of the Council of 21 March 1972 fixing the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community
Cited by 12: K v Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen (Uwv) (C-285/20); Gazdasági Versenyhivatal v Budapest Bank Nyrt. and Others (C-228/18); European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (C-356/15)2 provisions; Theodora Hendrika Bouman v Rijksdienst voor Pensioenen (C-114/13)2 provisions; I v Health Service Executive (C-255/13)2 provisions; Caisse nationale des prestations familiales v Ulrike Wiering and Markus Wiering (C-347/12)2 provisions; Jörn Petersen v Landesgeschäftsstelle des Arbeitsmarktservice Niederösterreich (C-228/07); Roberto Adanez-Vega v Bundesanstalt für Arbeit (C-372/02)2 provisions; Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands (C-311/01)2 provisions; Fitzwilliam Executive Search Ltd v Bestuur van het Landelijk instituut sociale verzekeringen (C-202/97)2 provisions; Robin Swaddling v Adjudication Officer (C-90/97)2 provisions; H. Meints v Minister van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij (C-57/96)2 provisions
Cites 11: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71; Silvana di Paolo v Office national de l'emploi (76/76); Anna Bergemann v Bundesanstalt für Arbeit (236/87); Biagio Valentini v ASSEDIC de Lyon (171/82); Horst Miethe v Bundesanstalt für Arbeit (1/85); Giuseppe Romano v Institut national d'assurance maladie-invalidité (98/80); Josef Rebmann v Bundesversicherungsanstalt für Angestellte (58/87); Gaetano Bonaffini and others v Istituto Nazionale della Previdenza Sociale (INPS) (27/75); Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 of the Council of 21 March 1972 fixing the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community; Council Directive 83/182/EEC