Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Alicia Speybrouck v European Parliament (T-45/90)
Judgment
Substance
1. The daim for annulment of the decis…
The fourth plea: lack of a statement o…
90

Alicia Speybrouck v European Parliament (T-45/90)

Judgment of 28 Jan 1992law://eu/cjeu/1990/t-45-90/para_90@2026-11-12

90The Court observes in the first place that by contrast with officials, whose security of tenure is guaranteed by the Staff Regulations, temporary staff are subject to specific conditions based on the contract of employment entered into with the institution concerned.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Fifth Chamber
Case: T-45/90 · ECLI:EU:T:1992:7
Decided: 28 Jan 1992
Procedure: staff cases unfounded
Applicant: Alicia Spcybrouck
Defendant: European Parliament
Rapporteur: Barrington
Bench: 2 judges
D. Barrington, H. Kirschner
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 61990TJ0045

Topics

Staff Regulations of Officials

History · 1 version

28 Jan 1992Reading

Connections

Cited by 23: QN v European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (T-484/22)2 provisions; Annemieke Bax v European Central Bank (T-433/18); VY v European Commission (T-253/18); Séverine Scheefer v European Parliament (F-41/12); BG v European Ombudsman (F-54/11); Éric Mathias Fries Guggenheim v European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (F-47/09); P v European Parliament (F-89/08); Fondation européenne pour la formation v Pia Landgren (T-404/06); Bettina Klug v European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (F-35/07); Radu Duta v Court of Justice of the European Union (F-103/07); José María Carpi Badía v Commission of the European Communities (F-110/06); Daniel Dittert v European Commission (F-109/06); Irène Bianchi v Fondation européenne pour la formation (F-38/06); Pia Landgren v Fondation européenne pour la formation (F-1/05); André Bonnet v Court of Justice of the European Union (T-406/04); Andreas Mausolf v European Police Office (Europol) (T-258/03); Norbert Schmitt v European Agency for Reconstruction (EAR) (T-175/03); Norman Pyres v Commission of the European Communities (T-7/01); Chantal Hectors v European Parliament (T-181/01); Paul Edwin Hoyer v European Commission (T-70/00); Natalia Martínez Páramo and Others v European Commission (T-137/99); Patrick Reynolds v European Parliament (T-237/00)2 provisions; Francis Panichelli v European Parliament (T-130/98)
Cites 18: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 of the Council of 29 February 1968 laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities and instituting special measures temporarily applicable to officials of the Commission (Staff Regulations of Officials); Raymond Louwage and Others v European Commission (148/73); Rudy Verzyck v European Commission (225/82); Eva von Lachmüller, Bernard Peuvrier, Roger Ehrhardt v Commission of the European Economic Community (C-43/59, C-45/59, C-48/59); Salvatore Ragusa v European Commission (282/81); Jeanne Airola v European Commission (21/74); Chehab Razzouk and Abbas Beydoun v European Commission (75/82, 117/82); André Schertzer v European Parliament (25/68); Council Directive 76/207/EEC of 9 February 1976 on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions; Elisabeth Johanna Pacifica Dekker v Stichting Vormingscentrum voor Jong Volwassenen (VJV-Centrum) Plus (C-177/88); Alain de Briey v European Commission (25/80); Handels- og Kontorfunktionaerernes Forbund i Danmark v Dansk Arbejdsgiverforening (C-179/88); Rudolf Pieter Marie Fiddelaar v Commission of the European Economic Community (44/59); Dorothea Kobor v European Commission (T-7/90); Otto Scheer v Einfuhr- und Vorratsstelle für Getreide und Futtermittel (30/70); Luisa Bertoni (épouse Sabbatini) v European Parliament (20/71); André Schertzer v European Parliament (C-25/68)